ConductCognition
  • Domains

    Tests

    • Processing speed43
    • Attention113
    • Working memory50
    • Executive function143
    • Episodic memory72
    • Response inhibition9
    • Social cognition75
    • Language42

    Most used

    Evidence

    1. Verbal Fluency TestGradeA
    2. Stroop Color-Word TestGradeA
    3. Trail Making TestGradeA
    4. N-Back TaskGradeA
    5. Go/No-Go TaskGradeA
    6. Digit Span TestGradeA
    7. Symbol Coding TestGradeA
    8. Verbal Learning TestGradeA
    REDTry it nowStroop Color-Word Test
    All 547 tests

    Browse by

    • Phone290
    • Tablet323
    • Untimed326
    • Up to 5 minutes69
    • Evidence grade A40
  • First studies

    Grade, length

    • Reaction Time StudyGradeA7 min
    • Pilot ScreeningGradeA15 min
    • Medication StudiesGradeA−26 min
    • Language-Minimized ScreeningGradeA−30 min

    Age groups

    • Older Adult Executive SpeedGradeA20 min
    • School-AgeGradeA−33 min

    Memory

    • At-Home MemoryGradeA26 min
    • Working Memory and LearningGradeA−19 min
    • Associative MemoryGradeB32 min
    • Working Memory CapacityGradeB34 min

    Language and perception

    • LanguageGradeA−33 min
    • Visual PerceptionGradeB27 min
    • Listening and Auditory ProcessingGradeB31 min

    Executive function and attention

    • Executive ControlGradeA18 min
    • Attention and ImpulsivityGradeA−26 min
    • Visual AttentionGradeB27 min
    • Creativity and Flexible ThinkingGradeB30 min
    • Reasoning and SpatialGradeB32 min

    Movement

    • Motor and AttentionGradeA−29 min
    • Motor LearningGradeB34 min

    Behavior, mood and choice

    • Food Choice and Self-ControlGradeA−29 min
    • Sleep and FatigueGradeB23 min
    • Social CognitionGradeB23 min
    • Impulsivity and Substance UseGradeB26 min
    • Emotion and MoodGradeB28 min
    • Decisions and RewardGradeB29 min
    All 26 batteries

    Find one

    Up to 15 minutes2Up to 30 minutes19Phone8
    Test order labBattery gradesHow batteries work
  • Use and evidence

    • Overview
    • Compare all 547 tests
    • Test-retest
    • Reliability and validity
    • Battery grades26
    • Download and cite

    Clinical trials

    • Overview
    • By condition25
    • By test101
    • Trial design benchmark
    • Cognitive outcomes, 2026

    Conditions

    Registered studies

    • Dementia and Alzheimer's1,673
    • Aging, frailty and exercise1,398
    • Depression and bipolar disorder1,247
    • Stroke1,233
    • Substance use and addiction895
    • Parkinson's disease892
    • Cancer760
    All 25 conditions
    16,361Registered studies name a cognitive test in an outcome measure11,688 name a test you can run hereExplore the studies
  • 1

    Build

    • Study design
    • Customize tests
    • Repeat visits
    • Study cost calculator
    2

    Recruit

    • Recruitment setup
    • Prolific
    • Sona Systems
    • CloudResearch Connect
    • Qualtrics
    3

    Run

    • Remote testing
    • Participant devices
    • Phone timing check
    • Offline edition
    4

    Results

    • Automated scoring
    • Test norms
    • Study Quality Monitor
    • Data export
    Platform overview

    Compliance

    • HIPAA-ready testing
    • US clinical research
    • Data Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Research areas

    Tests used in each

    • Aging and dementia188
    • Decisions and reward105
    • Child development and education87
    • Language and bilingualism64
    • Social behavior62
    • Psychiatric groups35
    • Training and intervention28
    • Mood, anxiety and trauma25
    • Substance use and impulsivity25
    • Neurological and movement research19
    • Brain injury and concussion14
    • Sleep and fatigue14
    • ADHD11
    • Eating and obesity8
    • Medication and drug trials8

    Research settings

    • Student participant pools
    • Teaching a class
    • Clinical trials
    • US clinical research
    • Sites without internet
    Planning a study?
  • Methods

    • How evidence grades work
    • How test batteries work
    • How test order works
    Methods and questions

    Help

    • FAQ
    • Recruitment guides
    • Compare platforms

    Updates

    • Blog
    • New tests by email
    Latest post10 November 2026What you can do in ConductCognition todayA short tour of ConductCognition as it stands on 10 November. After this, we'll post when something changes how you run a study.Read the post
  • Pricing
Start Free
Log In
Log InStart Free
  1. Home
  2. /Data
  3. /Clinical trials
  4. /Tests
  5. /Motor Sequence Task

Clinical trials data

Motor Sequence Task in clinical trials: 30 registered studies

Every registered study on ClinicalTrials.gov that names the Motor Sequence Task in an outcome measure: the conditions it is used in, how often it is a primary outcome, the tests it is named with, and how large the studies are.

Registered studies name it in an outcome measure
30
Name it in a primary outcome, 53%
16 of 30
Against similar tests
Of studies started 2021 to 2025 name it, against 0.2% in 2016 to 2020
0.3%
By year
Median participants per study
48
By phase
Try the Motor Sequence Task

The conditions it is used in

Each study counted once in each condition group it falls in.
  1. Stroke7 studies, 3 as a primary outcome

  2. Sleep and sleep disorders5 studies, 2 as a primary outcome

  3. Schizophrenia and psychosis4 studies, 2 as a primary outcome

  4. Parkinson's disease3 studies, 3 as a primary outcome

  5. Healthy volunteers3 studies, 2 as a primary outcome

  6. Aging, frailty and exercise2 studies, 1 as a primary outcome

  7. Brain injury and concussion1 study, 1 as a primary outcome

  8. Depression and bipolar disorder1 study, 1 as a primary outcome

  9. Epilepsy1 study, 0 as a primary outcome

  10. Other conditions4 studies, 2 as a primary outcome

A test as a primary outcomeOnly in secondary or other outcomes

How often it is a primary outcome

The Motor Sequence Task is a primary outcome in 53% of its studies. Across the 11 processing speed tests with a page here, the median is 42%.
  1. Motor Sequence Task53% of 30 studies

  2. Serial Reaction Time48% of 27 studies

  3. Arithmetic Fluency Task47% of 101 studies

  4. Mirror Tracing Task43% of 23 studies

  5. Symbol Scan Task42% of 129 studies

  6. Paced Visual Serial Addition Test42% of 337 studies

  7. Simple Reaction Time40% of 210 studies

  8. Finger Tapping Task38% of 144 studies

  9. Pattern and Letter Comparison35% of 147 studies

  10. Symbol Coding31% of 1,457 studies

  11. Trail Making Test31% of 2,293 studies

Studies by start year

0.3% of the registered studies that started in 2021 to 2025 name it, against 0.2% of those that started in 2016 to 2020. 2026 is partly planned starts.
02000: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome20002001: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2002: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2003: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2004: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2005: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome20052006: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2007: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2008: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2009: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2010: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome20102011: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2012: 1 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2013: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2014: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2015: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome20152016: 3 studies, 2 with a test as a primary outcome2017: 0 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2018: 1 studies, 1 with a test as a primary outcome2019: 1 studies, 1 with a test as a primary outcome2020: 4 studies, 2 with a test as a primary outcome20202021: 6 studies, 2 with a test as a primary outcome2022: 2 studies, 0 with a test as a primary outcome2023: 2 studies, 1 with a test as a primary outcome2024: 4 studies, 2 with a test as a primary outcome2025: 4 studies, 3 with a test as a primary outcome20252026: 2 studies, 2 with a test as a primary outcome

A test as a primary outcomeOnly in secondary or other outcomes

Show as a table
Registered studies by start year
Start yearStudiesA test as a primary outcome
200000
200100
200200
200300
200400
200500
200600
200700
200800
200900
201000
201100
201210
201300
201400
201500
201632
201700
201811
201911
202042
202162
202220
202321
202442
202543
202622

Phases and study sizes

By phase

  • Phase 1/22 studies, 0 as a primary outcome
  • Phase 23 studies, 1 as a primary outcome
  • Not applicable24 studies, 14 as a primary outcome
  • Observational1 studies, 1 as a primary outcome

Participants per study

102050100
  • Not applicable40 median, 24 to 60
Participants per study. The bar spans the middle half of the studies in each phase, the mark is the median, and the axis is logarithmic. Phases with fewer than 10 studies that give a size are left out.
Show as a table
Participants per study that names the Motor Sequence Task, by phase
PhaseStudies with a sizeMedianMiddle half
Not applicable234024 to 60

When trials measure it

Half of the primary outcomes that name the Motor Sequence Task are measured within a day of the start, and the middle half from the first day to 1 week. 13 primary outcomes give a duration.

Latest time point of each outcome

  • Within a day10 outcomes, 8 as a primary outcome
  • Up to 4 weeks6 outcomes, 3 as a primary outcome
  • 1 to 3 months3 outcomes, 1 as a primary outcome
  • 3 to 6 months1 outcomes, 1 as a primary outcome
  • 6 to 12 months1 outcomes, 0 as a primary outcome
  • No duration given9 outcomes, 3 as a primary outcome

A test as a primary outcomeOnly in secondary or other outcomes

21 of the 30 outcome measures give a duration. A single visit counts as within a day.

Status, results, interventions and countries

Status

  • Recruiting10 studies, 6 as a primary outcome
  • Active, not recruiting2 studies, 1 as a primary outcome
  • Completed13 studies, 6 as a primary outcome
  • Stopped early2 studies, 1 as a primary outcome
  • Status unknown3 studies, 2 as a primary outcome

What they test

  • Behavioral6 studies, 3 as a primary outcome
  • Drug6 studies, 1 as a primary outcome
  • Device9 studies, 5 as a primary outcome
  • Procedure2 studies, 2 as a primary outcome
  • Diagnostic test2 studies, 2 as a primary outcome
  • Radiation1 studies, 0 as a primary outcome
  • Other8 studies, 4 as a primary outcome

Intervention types as registered. A study can list several; observational studies often list none.

Where their sites are

  • United States12 studies, 5 as a primary outcome
  • Switzerland4 studies, 2 as a primary outcome
  • Germany3 studies, 2 as a primary outcome
  • Hong Kong2 studies, 2 as a primary outcome
  • South Korea2 studies, 0 as a primary outcome
  • Australia1 studies, 0 as a primary outcome
  • China1 studies, 1 as a primary outcome
  • France1 studies, 1 as a primary outcome
  • Netherlands1 studies, 0 as a primary outcome
  • Türkiye1 studies, 1 as a primary outcome

10 countries in all. A study with sites in several counts in each; 2 list no site.

Reported results

Completed studies with results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov, a results paper the registry links to the study, or both.

Completed studies that name the Motor Sequence Task: 7 of 13, 54%

Every completed study with a cognitive outcome: 3,626 of 7,953, 46%

Completed studies that name the Motor Sequence Task and every completed study, by how they reported results
ResultsCompleted studies that name the Motor Sequence TaskEvery completed study
Results on ClinicalTrials.gov and a paper1, 8%776, 10%
Results on ClinicalTrials.gov only2, 15%1,139, 14%
A results paper only4, 31%1,711, 22%
Neither6, 46%4,327, 54%

Tests named in the same studies

The library tests that studies naming the Motor Sequence Task name most often beside it.
  1. 1

    Finger Tapping Task11 studies, 6 as a primary outcome

  2. 2

    Psychomotor Vigilance Task6 studies, 2 as a primary outcome

  3. 3

    Verbal Learning3 studies, 0 as a primary outcome

  4. 4

    Serial Reaction Time2 studies, 1 as a primary outcome

  5. 5

    Stroop Color-Word Test2 studies, 0 as a primary outcome

  6. 6

    Trail Making Test2 studies, 0 as a primary outcome

  7. 7

    Verbal Fluency2 studies, 0 as a primary outcome

  8. 8

    Arithmetic Fluency Task1 study, 1 as a primary outcome

  9. 9

    N-Back Task1 study, 1 as a primary outcome

  10. 10

    Arrival Timing Task1 study, 0 as a primary outcome

A test as a primary outcomeOnly in secondary or other outcomes

Compared over time

Studies per start year for the Motor Sequence Task and the tests named with it most. Add or remove tests to compare.
Motor Sequence Task30 studies, 2000 to 2026
01002002000201020202026
Finger Tapping Task141 studies, 2000 to 2026
01002002000201020202026
Psychomotor Vigilance Task394 studies, 2000 to 2026
01002002000201020202026
Verbal Learning1,819 studies, 2000 to 2026
01002002000201020202026

The panel's testThe other tests chosenEvery panel has the same scale. 2026 is partly planned starts.

Show as a table
Registered studies per start year that name each test
Start yearMotor Sequence TaskFinger Tapping TaskPsychomotor Vigilance TaskVerbal Learning
20000001
20010105
20020018
200300314
200400114
200500317
200601713
200700522
200800428
200902228
201002942
201100533
201211642
2013051153
2014021282
2015031291
2016362198
20170615107
2018182192
201911125122
20204112176
202161032137
202221431138
202321629157
202441532144
202541433132
202621353123

Explore the 30 studies

Filter by condition, phase, sponsor, status, country, intervention, outcome list, size and start year. Each study links to its record on ClinicalTrials.gov.
TestThe Motor Sequence Task

30 studies match. 16 name the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome. Median size 48 participants. Median time to the primary outcome: same day.

Loading 30 studies; the filters turn on when they arrive.

By start year
02462000: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome20002001: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2002: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2003: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2004: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2005: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome20052006: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2007: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2008: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2009: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2010: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome20102011: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2012: 1 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2013: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2014: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2015: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome20152016: 3 studies, 2 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2017: 0 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2018: 1 studies, 1 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2019: 1 studies, 1 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2020: 4 studies, 2 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome20202021: 6 studies, 2 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2022: 2 studies, 0 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2023: 2 studies, 1 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2024: 4 studies, 2 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome2025: 4 studies, 3 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome20252026: 2 studies, 2 naming the Motor Sequence Task in a primary outcome

2026 is partly planned starts.

Show as a table
Matching studies by start year
Start yearStudiesAs a primary outcome
200000
200100
200200
200300
200400
200500
200600
200700
200800
200900
201000
201100
201210
201300
201400
201500
201632
201700
201811
201911
202042
202162
202220
202321
202442
202543
202622

Library tests named most

  • Motor Sequence Task30 studies, 16 as a primary outcome
  • Finger Tapping Task11 studies, 6 as a primary outcome
  • Psychomotor Vigilance Task6 studies, 2 as a primary outcome
  • Verbal Learning3 studies, 0 as a primary outcome
  • Serial Reaction Time2 studies, 1 as a primary outcome
  • Stroop Color-Word Test2 studies, 0 as a primary outcome
  • Trail Making Test2 studies, 0 as a primary outcome
  • Verbal Fluency2 studies, 0 as a primary outcome
  • Arithmetic Fluency Task1 study, 1 as a primary outcome
  • N-Back Task1 study, 1 as a primary outcome

Conditions

Phases

Participants

Lead sponsor: other 30. Interventional 29, observational 1.

As a primary outcomeSecondary or other outcomeThe Motor Sequence Task

The studies, newest registration first

Each number opens the study's record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Registered studies that match the filters, newest registration first, with the library tests each one names and the outcome list that names them.
StudyStartPhaseConditionsParticipantsLead sponsorStatusLibrary tests named, with the latest time point
NCT07658274Start2026PhaseNot applicableConditionsHealthy volunteersParticipants30Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Finger Tapping TaskPrimarysame day
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimarysame day
NCT07220005Start2025PhaseNot applicableConditionsStrokeParticipants24Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimarysame day
NCT07080567Start2025PhasePhase 2ConditionsStrokeParticipants80Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondary13 weeks
NCT06998368Start2024PhaseNot applicableConditionsSleep and sleep disordersParticipants30Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Psychomotor Vigilance TaskSecondary
  • Finger Tapping TaskSecondary
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondary
NCT06950060Start2026PhaseNot applicableConditionsStroke, Aging, frailty and exerciseParticipants48Lead sponsorOtherStatusActive, not recruitingLibrary tests named
  • Verbal FluencySecondary5 days
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimary5 days
  • Serial Reaction TimePrimary5 days
NCT06822283Start2021PhaseNot applicableConditionsBrain injury and concussionParticipants19Lead sponsorOtherStatusCompleted

Paper

Library tests named
  • Finger Tapping TaskPrimarysame day
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimarysame day
NCT06765642Start2025PhaseNot applicableConditionsStrokeParticipants26Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimarysame day
NCT06688526Start2024PhaseNot applicableConditionsHealthy volunteersParticipantsNot givenLead sponsorOtherStatusStopped earlyLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondarysame day
NCT06580977Start2024PhaseNot applicableConditionsParkinson's diseaseParticipants60Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Trail Making TestSecondary16 weeks
  • Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary16 weeks
  • Verbal LearningSecondary16 weeks
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimary16 weeks
NCT06386588Start2025PhaseNot applicableConditionsSchizophrenia and psychosisParticipants60Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimary1 week
NCT06174740Start2023PhaseNot applicableConditionsAging, frailty and exerciseParticipants50Lead sponsorOtherStatusCompletedLibrary tests named
  • Trail Making TestSecondary8 weeks
  • Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary8 weeks
  • Verbal LearningSecondary8 weeks
  • Verbal FluencySecondary8 weeks
  • Digit Span TestSecondary8 weeks
  • Finger Tapping TaskOther outcome8 weeks
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondary8 weeks
  • Numerical Stroop TaskOther outcome8 weeks
NCT06140940Start2024PhaseNot applicableConditionsOther conditionsParticipants40Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Finger Tapping TaskPrimary
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimary
  • Hand Laterality TaskSecondary
  • Source Memory TaskSecondary
  • Arrival Timing TaskSecondary
NCT05765708Start2023PhaseNot applicableConditionsHealthy volunteersParticipants120Lead sponsorOtherStatusStatus unknownLibrary tests named
  • Finger Tapping TaskPrimarysame day
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimarysame day
NCT05344170Start2022PhasePhase 1/2ConditionsSleep and sleep disordersParticipants20Lead sponsorOtherStatusCompleted

Paper

Library tests named
  • Psychomotor Vigilance TaskOther outcome
  • Finger Tapping TaskOther outcome
  • Motor Sequence TaskOther outcome
NCT05275114Start2022PhaseNot applicableConditionsStrokeParticipants24Lead sponsorOtherStatusCompleted

Paper

Library tests named
  • Finger Tapping TaskSecondary4 weeks
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondary4 weeks
NCT05016531Start2021PhaseNot applicableConditionsStrokeParticipants18Lead sponsorOtherStatusCompleted

ResultsPaper

Library tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondary
NCT04903457Start2021PhaseNot applicableConditionsStrokeParticipants21Lead sponsorOtherStatusCompletedLibrary tests named
  • Finger Tapping TaskSecondary
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondary
NCT04811066Start2021PhaseNot applicableConditionsParkinson's diseaseParticipants48Lead sponsorOtherStatusCompletedLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimary4 weeks
NCT04788628Start2021PhaseNot applicableConditionsEpilepsyParticipants24Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondary3 weeks
NCT04787406Start2019PhaseNot applicableConditionsParkinson's diseaseParticipants33Lead sponsorOtherStatusCompletedLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimary
NCT04783571Start2020PhaseNot applicableConditionsSchizophrenia and psychosisParticipants70Lead sponsorOtherStatusActive, not recruitingLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondary1 week
NCT04749992Start2018PhaseObservationalConditionsSleep and sleep disordersParticipants142Lead sponsorOtherStatusStopped early

Paper

Library tests named
  • Verbal LearningSecondarysame day
  • Delayed Recall ModuleSecondarysame day
  • Finger Tapping TaskPrimarysame day
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimarysame day
NCT04745312Start2021PhaseNot applicableConditionsOther conditionsParticipants16Lead sponsorOtherStatusStatus unknown

Paper

Library tests named
  • Psychomotor Vigilance TaskOther outcomesame day
  • Arithmetic Fluency TaskPrimarysame day
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondarysame day
NCT04611009Start2020PhasePhase 2ConditionsOther conditionsParticipants54Lead sponsorOtherStatusRecruitingLibrary tests named
  • Motor Sequence TaskSecondary12 months
  • Serial Reaction TimeSecondary12 months
NCT04605367Start2020PhaseNot applicableConditionsOther conditionsParticipants105Lead sponsorOtherStatusStatus unknownLibrary tests named
  • Finger Tapping TaskPrimary
  • Motor Sequence TaskPrimary

Page 1 of 2

Questions, answered from the data

How many clinical trials use the Motor Sequence Task?

30 registered studies on ClinicalTrials.gov name it in an outcome measure, 16 of them in a primary outcome.

In which conditions do trials use the Motor Sequence Task?

Most often in stroke (7), sleep and sleep disorders (5) and schizophrenia and psychosis (4).

Which tests do trials use with the Motor Sequence Task?

The Finger Tapping Task (11 studies), the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (6 studies) and Verbal Learning (3 studies).

When do trials measure the Motor Sequence Task?

Half of the primary outcomes that name the Motor Sequence Task are measured within a day of the start, and the middle half from the first day to 1 week. 13 primary outcomes give a duration.

How many completed trials that use the Motor Sequence Task have reported results?

7 of the 13 completed studies that name it, 54%, have reported results: 3 posted them on ClinicalTrials.gov, 5 have a results paper linked to the registry record, and 1 did both. The other 6 show neither. Of all completed studies with a cognitive outcome, 46% have reported results.

More on tests in clinical trials

  • Motor Sequence Task: what it measures, its scores, and a version to try
  • All 101 tests in clinical trials
  • Cognitive tests by condition
  • Every registered study, by test, condition, phase and year

How the studies are counted

For each test family, the census runs ClinicalTrials.gov's own outcome search for the family's names and reads every study first posted by the day the family was counted. These studies were read on 10 November 2026. A study counts once on a page, however many tests it names. Counts for a test cover every version of the task under any of its names, so a page can count studies that used a commercial version.

The census adds two things to each record and changes nothing in it: which outcome list names the test (primary, then secondary, then other), and the condition groups, matched on the study's condition names and MeSH terms. A study can fall in several groups; one whose only condition is cognitive impairment or decline falls in “Cognitive impairment and decline”. Studies that name only instruments outside the library count in every total and share but are not listed.

A second read on 10 November 2026 added each study's overall status, whether results are posted, its intervention types, the countries of its sites and the time frame of the outcome that names each test. A time frame counts by the latest time point it names: “Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks” is 24 weeks, a single visit is within a day, and one that names no duration, such as “end of treatment”, is left out of the timings.

A third read on 10 November 2026 added the papers the registry links to each study: those its sponsor lists as reporting results, and those PubMed links to it through the study's NCT number. A study has a results paper when one of them came out in or after the month of its primary completion and PubMed does not class it as a protocol, review or comment. A paper that never gives the NCT number is not linked, so some studies counted as reporting neither did publish.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, which does not endorse these pages. Every study line is in the data release 2.1.0, and the explorer's own file is clinical-trials-studies.json.

Run the Motor Sequence Task in your trial

Choose tests with a record in registered trials, and run them in a browser at every site, on the same version each visit.

Start free
ConductCognition

Hosted browser-native cognitive testing for academic and commercial research workflows.

A product of ConductScience, Inc.

New tests and features, about once a month. Unsubscribe at any time.

Tests

  • All cognitive tests
  • Test batteries
  • Use and evidence
  • Test norms
  • Trail Making Test
  • N-Back Task
  • Automated scoring
  • Study design
  • New tests by email

Guides

  • Methods and questions
  • Blog
  • Recruitment setup
  • Participant devices
  • Prolific
  • Sona Systems
  • CloudResearch Connect
  • Qualtrics

Use cases

  • Student participant pools
  • Aging and dementia research
  • Clinical trials
  • US clinical research
  • Remote testing

Compare and buy

  • Pricing
  • Compare platforms
  • Offline edition
  • FAQ

Trust

  • Study Quality Monitor
  • HIPAA-ready testing
  • Data export
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Data Policy

Company

  • ConductScience
  • Affiliate Program
© 2026 ConductScience, Inc. Research use only.