ConductCognition
  • Domains

    Tests

    • Processing speed43
    • Attention113
    • Working memory50
    • Executive function143
    • Episodic memory72
    • Response inhibition9
    • Social cognition75
    • Language42

    Most used

    Evidence

    1. Verbal Fluency TestGradeA
    2. Stroop Color-Word TestGradeA
    3. Trail Making TestGradeA
    4. N-Back TaskGradeA
    5. Go/No-Go TaskGradeA
    6. Digit Span TestGradeA
    7. Symbol Coding TestGradeA
    8. Verbal Learning TestGradeA
    REDTry it nowStroop Color-Word Test
    All 547 tests

    Browse by

    • Phone290
    • Tablet323
    • Untimed326
    • Up to 5 minutes69
    • Evidence grade A40
  • First studies

    Grade, length

    • Reaction Time StudyGradeA7 min
    • Pilot ScreeningGradeA15 min
    • Medication StudiesGradeA−26 min
    • Language-Minimized ScreeningGradeA−30 min

    Age groups

    • Older Adult Executive SpeedGradeA20 min
    • School-AgeGradeA−33 min

    Memory

    • At-Home MemoryGradeA26 min
    • Working Memory and LearningGradeA−19 min
    • Associative MemoryGradeB32 min
    • Working Memory CapacityGradeB34 min

    Language and perception

    • LanguageGradeA−33 min
    • Visual PerceptionGradeB27 min
    • Listening and Auditory ProcessingGradeB31 min

    Executive function and attention

    • Executive ControlGradeA18 min
    • Attention and ImpulsivityGradeA−26 min
    • Visual AttentionGradeB27 min
    • Creativity and Flexible ThinkingGradeB30 min
    • Reasoning and SpatialGradeB32 min

    Movement

    • Motor and AttentionGradeA−29 min
    • Motor LearningGradeB34 min

    Behavior, mood and choice

    • Food Choice and Self-ControlGradeA−29 min
    • Sleep and FatigueGradeB23 min
    • Social CognitionGradeB23 min
    • Impulsivity and Substance UseGradeB26 min
    • Emotion and MoodGradeB28 min
    • Decisions and RewardGradeB29 min
    All 26 batteries

    Find one

    Up to 15 minutes2Up to 30 minutes19Phone8
    Test order labBattery gradesHow batteries work
  • Use and evidence

    • Overview
    • Compare all 547 tests
    • Test-retest
    • Reliability and validity
    • Battery grades26
    • Download and cite

    Clinical trials

    • Overview
    • By condition25
    • By test101
    • Trial design benchmark
    • Cognitive outcomes, 2026

    Conditions

    Registered studies

    • Dementia and Alzheimer's1,673
    • Aging, frailty and exercise1,398
    • Depression and bipolar disorder1,247
    • Stroke1,233
    • Substance use and addiction895
    • Parkinson's disease892
    • Cancer760
    All 25 conditions
    16,361Registered studies name a cognitive test in an outcome measure11,688 name a test you can run hereExplore the studies
  • 1

    Build

    • Study design
    • Customize tests
    • Repeat visits
    • Study cost calculator
    2

    Recruit

    • Recruitment setup
    • Prolific
    • Sona Systems
    • CloudResearch Connect
    • Qualtrics
    3

    Run

    • Remote testing
    • Participant devices
    • Phone timing check
    • Offline edition
    4

    Results

    • Automated scoring
    • Test norms
    • Study Quality Monitor
    • Data export
    Platform overview

    Compliance

    • HIPAA-ready testing
    • US clinical research
    • Data Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Research areas

    Tests used in each

    • Aging and dementia188
    • Decisions and reward105
    • Child development and education87
    • Language and bilingualism64
    • Social behavior62
    • Psychiatric groups35
    • Training and intervention28
    • Mood, anxiety and trauma25
    • Substance use and impulsivity25
    • Neurological and movement research19
    • Brain injury and concussion14
    • Sleep and fatigue14
    • ADHD11
    • Eating and obesity8
    • Medication and drug trials8

    Research settings

    • Student participant pools
    • Teaching a class
    • Clinical trials
    • US clinical research
    • Sites without internet
    Planning a study?
  • Methods

    • How evidence grades work
    • How test batteries work
    • How test order works
    Methods and questions

    Help

    • FAQ
    • Recruitment guides
    • Compare platforms

    Updates

    • Blog
    • New tests by email
    Latest post10 November 2026What you can do in ConductCognition todayA short tour of ConductCognition as it stands on 10 November. After this, we'll post when something changes how you run a study.Read the post
  • Pricing
Start Free
Log In
Log InStart Free
  1. Home
  2. /Tests
  3. /Digit Span Test

Working Memory

Digit Span Test

Assess verbal working-memory span with adaptive forward and backward digit recall in the browser.

5-7 minUntimed

Create a study with this test

Free to start: 10 free participants per account, then $0.99 per participant for academic research, or any yearly plan. Try it here first, with no account.

Papers, 2021 to 2025
2,755
Evidence grade
A
Registered clinical studies
1,629
How these are counted
4729
Recall:
?
?
?
?
Type the digits...
Remember the sequence
  • Overview
  • Evidence
  • Quality checks
  • Settings
  • Cite
  • Questions

What it measures

Measures verbal working memory capacity by asking participants to recall sequences of digits in forward and backward order.

Constructs

  • Verbal working memory capacity
  • Phonological loop
  • Mental manipulation (backward)
  • Serial recall
  • Executive working memory (backward)

Research uses

  • Intellectual disability assessment
  • Dementia screening (WAIS subtest)
  • Learning disability evaluation
  • Traumatic brain injury assessment
  • Pre/post intervention measurement

How the paradigm works

The Digit Span Test measures verbal working memory capacity using an adaptive staircase procedure. In the forward phase, participants view a sequence of digits (1-9) presented one at a time and must type them back in order. In the backward phase, they must recall the digits in reverse order.

More about the paradigm

The test starts at a span of 3 digits and increases by one digit after successful recall. Two trials are given at each span length; the participant must pass at least one to advance. The test terminates when both trials at a span length are failed, or when the maximum span (9) is reached.

Forward span primarily taps the phonological loop component of working memory (passive maintenance and rehearsal). Backward span additionally requires mental manipulation and reordering, engaging executive working memory processes. The forward-backward difference isolates executive contribution to working memory performance.

Scores

Forward Spanscore
Longest digit sequence correctly recalled in forward order. Primary capacity measure.
Higher is better
Backward Spanscore
Longest digit sequence correctly recalled in reverse order. Null if backward phase not included.
Higher is better
Total Scorescore
Forward span + backward span. Composite working memory measure.
Higher is better
Longest Forwardscore
Same as forward span. Maximum sequence length achieved.
Higher is better
Longest Backwardscore
Same as backward span. Maximum reverse sequence length achieved.
Higher is better

Use and evidence

2,755 papers from 2021 to 2025 name this task in their title or abstract, up 16% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 8 of 582 test families in our census. See the counts for every test.

2021 to 2025, the years gradedEarlier years
Papers per year naming the Digit Span Test, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 464; 2022: 456; 2023: 580; 2024: 545; 2025: 710 papers. Peak year 2025.02004006008002000: 99 papers2001: 93 papers2002: 99 papers2003: 129 papers2004: 136 papers2005: 162 papers2006: 149 papers2007: 167 papers2008: 209 papers2009: 213 papers2010: 272 papers2011: 262 papers2012: 338 papers2013: 343 papers2014: 360 papers2015: 408 papers2016: 438 papers2017: 468 papers2018: 494 papers2019: 468 papers2020: 509 papers2021: 464 papers2022: 456 papers2023: 580 papers2024: 545 papers2025: 710 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year naming the Digit Span Test, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 464; 2022: 456; 2023: 580; 2024: 545; 2025: 710 papers. Peak year 2025.02004006008002000: 99 papers2001: 93 papers2002: 99 papers2003: 129 papers2004: 136 papers2005: 162 papers2006: 149 papers2007: 167 papers2008: 209 papers2009: 213 papers2010: 272 papers2011: 262 papers2012: 338 papers2013: 343 papers2014: 360 papers2015: 408 papers2016: 438 papers2017: 468 papers2018: 494 papers2019: 468 papers2020: 509 papers2021: 464 papers2022: 456 papers2023: 580 papers2024: 545 papers2025: 710 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year whose title or abstract names this task (OpenAlex).
Show the numbers
YearPapers
2025710
2024545
2023580
2022456
2021464
2020509
2019468
2018494
2017468
2016438
2015408
2014360
2013343
2012338
2011262
2010272
2009213
2008209
2007167
2006149
2005162
2004136
2003129
200299
200193
200099
A

Use grade A

1,000 or more papers from 2021 to 2025.

A

Evidence grade A

At least 25 papers report its test-retest reliability and at least 25 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome.

Papers on test-retest reliability
136
Papers on reliability or validity
1,202
Registered clinical studies using it as an outcome
1,629

See which registered studies use it

Measured on ConductCognition

Pooled across the studies that feed our platform norms, by device group. A figure needs 50 or more people.

No pooled figure yet.

How the grades work

Use: A is 1,000 or more papers from 2021 to 2025, B 300 to 999, C 100 to 299, D 30 to 99 and E fewer than 30. Evidence: A means at least 25 papers report its test-retest reliability and at least 25 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome; B, at least 8 test-retest papers, and either 5 registered clinical studies or 150 reliability or validity papers; C, at least 2 test-retest papers, 30 reliability or validity papers or 3 registered clinical studies; D, little published measurement evidence found. The counts measure use. They include every paper that names the task in its title or abstract. Grades describe the published research on this task, not ConductCognition's version of it.

Source: ConductCognition test census 0.39.0, counted 31 October 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Quality checks

Each session is marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason, before you see its scores.

Scored rows: digit_forward and digit_backward. A recalled sequence has no meaningful chance level, so accuracy is not judged against chance; recall is untimed, so nothing can be missed. Recalling no forward sequence correctly is flagged. A hidden tab withholds the percentile.

Why these rules

A random digit sequence matches with probability 1/9 to the power of the span length, so chance is not meaningful, and a floor score can be a real result. A hidden tab lets the study, delay or response timers run without the participant, so a percentile is withheld after one.

Running this test

Settings you can change

SettingStandardAllowed
Starting span length32 to 5
Maximum span length96 to 12
Include backward spanOnOn or off

Yearly plans can change settings within these limits. Free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

How test settings work

Need a setting this test does not have?

Devices and languages

  • Untimed test: runs on desktops, laptops, tablets and phones. Participant devices
  • Languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese.
  • Available on: Every plan, including the free plan.
  • Recruiting online? See the setup guides for Prolific, Sona Systems, CloudResearch Connect and Qualtrics.

Included in these batteries

Each battery runs this test with others in a fixed order, with standard settings.

  • Working Memory and Learning Battery4 tests, 19 minutes per participant
  • Older Adult Executive Speed Battery4 tests, 20 minutes per participant
  • At-Home Memory Battery4 tests, 26 minutes per participant
  • School-Age Battery5 tests, 33 minutes per participant

Cite and describe

Methods text, with the standard settings

Participants completed the Digit Span Test in a web browser (ConductCognition task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0; Wechsler, 1939; Baddeley & Hitch, 1974), with the standard settings (starting span length: 3; maximum span length: 9; include backward span: On). The main score was forward span (longest digit sequence correctly recalled in forward order).

Paradigm source: Wechsler (1939); Baddeley & Hitch (1974).

ConductCognition versions: task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0. Every export records the versions each session used, for a methods section.

Source papers

  • Woods DL, Kishiyama MM, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Edwards B, Poliva O, Hink RF, Reed B (2011). Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(1):101-111.Paradigm source

Questions

How long does the Digit Span Test take?

About 5 to 7 minutes, as listed in the test library.

What device does a participant need?

Untimed test: runs on desktops, laptops, tablets and phones. The browser must be Chrome, Edge, Firefox or Safari.

What scores does it produce?

Forward Span, Backward Span, Total Score, Longest Forward and Longest Backward. Each session is also marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason.

How widely is the Digit Span Test used in research?

2,755 papers from 2021 to 2025 name it in their title or abstract, up 16% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 8 of 582 test families in the ConductCognition test census (use grade A). Source: ConductCognition test census 0.39.0, counted 31 October 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

How much reliability evidence does the Digit Span Test have?

In the published research, 136 papers report its test-retest reliability and 1,629 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome (evidence grade A in the ConductCognition test census).

Which settings can a researcher change?

Starting span length (2 to 5), maximum span length (6 to 12) and include backward span (On or off). Settings can be changed on yearly plans; free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

Which languages can participants use?

Participants can take this test in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese. English is on every plan, and the other languages come with yearly plans. Have a native speaker read the machine-translated text before launch.

Is this a clinical test?

No. ConductCognition is for research use only. It runs, scores and exports the test; clinical interpretation is outside the platform.

Every test: the full test list.

New tests and features, about once a month. Unsubscribe at any time.

Run this test in your next study

Start free with 10 free participants on any test, then use participant credits or a yearly plan.

Start free

Related tests

1-Back Task2-Back Task
ConductCognition

Hosted browser-native cognitive testing for academic and commercial research workflows.

A product of ConductScience, Inc.

Tests

  • All cognitive tests
  • Test batteries
  • Use and evidence
  • Test norms
  • Trail Making Test
  • N-Back Task
  • Automated scoring
  • Study design
  • New tests by email

Guides

  • Methods and questions
  • Blog
  • Recruitment setup
  • Participant devices
  • Prolific
  • Sona Systems
  • CloudResearch Connect
  • Qualtrics

Use cases

  • Student participant pools
  • Aging and dementia research
  • Clinical trials
  • US clinical research
  • Remote testing

Compare and buy

  • Pricing
  • Compare platforms
  • Offline edition
  • FAQ

Trust

  • Study Quality Monitor
  • HIPAA-ready testing
  • Data export
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Data Policy

Company

  • ConductScience
  • Affiliate Program
© 2026 ConductScience, Inc. Research use only.
Español