ConductCognition
  • Domains

    Tests

    • Processing speed43
    • Attention109
    • Working memory50
    • Executive function139
    • Episodic memory65
    • Response inhibition9
    • Social cognition72
    • Language36

    Most used

    Evidence

    1. Verbal Fluency TestGradeA
    2. Stroop Color-Word TestGradeA
    3. Trail Making TestGradeA
    4. N-Back TaskGradeA
    5. Go/No-Go TaskGradeA
    6. Digit Span TestGradeA
    7. Symbol Coding TestGradeA
    8. Verbal Learning TestGradeA
    REDTry it nowStroop Color-Word Test
    All 523 tests

    Browse by

    • Phone273
    • Tablet306
    • Untimed309
    • Up to 5 minutes63
    • Evidence grade A40
  • First studies

    Grade, length

    • Reaction Time StudyGradeA7 min
    • Pilot ScreeningGradeA15 min
    • Medication StudiesGradeA−26 min
    • Language-Minimized ScreeningGradeA−30 min

    Age groups

    • Older Adult Executive SpeedGradeA20 min
    • School-AgeGradeA−33 min

    Memory

    • At-Home MemoryGradeA26 min
    • Working Memory and LearningGradeA−19 min
    • Associative MemoryGradeB32 min
    • Working Memory CapacityGradeB34 min

    Language and perception

    • LanguageGradeA−33 min
    • Visual PerceptionGradeB27 min
    • Listening and Auditory ProcessingGradeB31 min

    Executive function and attention

    • Executive ControlGradeA18 min
    • Attention and ImpulsivityGradeA−26 min
    • Visual AttentionGradeB27 min
    • Creativity and Flexible ThinkingGradeB30 min
    • Reasoning and SpatialGradeB32 min

    Movement

    • Motor and AttentionGradeA−29 min
    • Motor LearningGradeB34 min

    Behavior, mood and choice

    • Food Choice and Self-ControlGradeA−29 min
    • Sleep and FatigueGradeB23 min
    • Social CognitionGradeB23 min
    • Impulsivity and Substance UseGradeB26 min
    • Emotion and MoodGradeB28 min
    • Decisions and RewardGradeB29 min
    All 26 batteries

    Find one

    Up to 15 minutes2Up to 30 minutes19Phone8
    Test order labBattery gradesHow batteries work
  • Use and evidence

    • Overview
    • Compare all 523 tests
    • Test-retest
    • Reliability and validity
    • Battery grades26
    • Download and cite

    Clinical trials

    • Overview
    • By condition25
    • By test101
    • Trial design benchmark
    • Cognitive outcomes, 2026

    Conditions

    Registered studies

    • Dementia and Alzheimer's1,673
    • Aging, frailty and exercise1,398
    • Depression and bipolar disorder1,247
    • Stroke1,233
    • Substance use and addiction895
    • Parkinson's disease892
    • Cancer760
    All 25 conditions
    16,361Registered studies name a cognitive test in an outcome measure11,686 name a test you can run hereExplore the studies
  • 1

    Build

    • Study design
    • Customize tests
    • Repeat visits
    • Study cost calculator
    2

    Recruit

    • Recruitment setup
    • Prolific
    • Sona Systems
    • CloudResearch Connect
    • Qualtrics
    3

    Run

    • Remote testing
    • Participant devices
    • Phone timing check
    • Offline edition
    4

    Results

    • Automated scoring
    • Test norms
    • Study Quality Monitor
    • Data export
    Platform overview

    Compliance

    • HIPAA-ready testing
    • US clinical research
    • Data Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Research areas

    Tests used in each

    • Aging and dementia185
    • Decisions and reward100
    • Child development and education84
    • Social behavior59
    • Language and bilingualism58
    • Psychiatric groups35
    • Training and intervention28
    • Mood, anxiety and trauma25
    • Substance use and impulsivity25
    • Neurological and movement research19
    • Brain injury and concussion14
    • Sleep and fatigue14
    • ADHD11
    • Eating and obesity8
    • Medication and drug trials8

    Research settings

    • Student participant pools
    • Teaching a class
    • Clinical trials
    • US clinical research
    • Sites without internet
    Planning a study?
  • Methods

    • How evidence grades work
    • How test batteries work
    • How test order works
    Methods and questions

    Help

    • FAQ
    • Recruitment guides
    • Compare platforms

    Updates

    • Blog
    • New tests by email
    Latest post10 November 2026What you can do in ConductCognition todayA short tour of ConductCognition as it stands on 10 November. After this, we'll post when something changes how you run a study.Read the post
  • Pricing
Start Free
Log In
Log InStart Free
  1. Home
  2. /Tests
  3. /Location Probability Task

Attention

Location Probability Task

Also called: Location probability learning, probability cueing, spatial probability learning

Measure how repeated target locations guide visual search. Compare search times in likely and less likely regions, then ask which region participants noticed.

12-18 minTimed: desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad

Create a study with this test

Free to start: 10 free participants per account, then $0.99 per participant for academic research, or any yearly plan. Try it here first, with no account.

Papers, 2021 to 2025
66
Evidence grade
D
Registered clinical studies
1
How these are counted
←→
Find the T
  • Overview
  • Evidence
  • Task design
  • Quality checks
  • Settings
  • Cite
  • Questions

What it measures

Measures learning of likely target locations during visual search. Participants find a turned T among L shapes. The target appears more often in one region before becoming equally likely everywhere. Scores the search-time advantage and awareness of the likely region.

Constructs

  • Spatial attention
  • Statistical learning
  • Visual search

Research uses

  • Attention research
  • Implicit learning research
  • Aging and visual search research

How the paradigm works

Find a turned T among eleven L shapes and report whether its stem points left or right. During acquisition, the T appears in one region on half the trials. In the final two blocks, every region is equally likely. Fresh layouts and three items per region keep the regularity in target location rather than a repeated display.

More about the paradigm

The main measure is the other-region minus likely-region response time during the last half of acquisition. Early learning, transfer, accuracy and a contrast excluding immediate region repetitions are reported separately. Correct responses from 100 to 6000 ms enter the time contrasts. Two questions after search ask whether participants noticed uneven locations and which region was most likely. These answers describe awareness; they do not establish unconscious learning.

Scores

Probability cueingms
Mean correct response time in other regions minus the likely region, in the last half of acquisition blocks.
Positive means faster search in the likely region
Early cueingms
The same response-time contrast in the first half of acquisition blocks.
Positive means faster search in the likely region
Transfer cueingms
The same response-time contrast in the final two blocks with equal target probabilities.
Positive means a persisting likely-region advantage
Cueing without immediate repeatsms
Late acquisition contrast excluding trials with the same target region as the preceding trial.
Helps separate learning from immediate location repetition
Likely-region response timems
Mean correct response time in the likely region during late acquisition.
Lower means faster search
Other-region response timems
Mean correct response time in other regions during late acquisition.
Lower means faster search
Search accuracy%
Correct answers divided by all search trials, including omissions.
Higher means more correct answers
Likely-region accuracy%
Accuracy in the likely region during acquisition.
Higher means more correct answers
Other-region accuracy%
Accuracy in other regions during acquisition.
Higher means more correct answers
Noticed uneven locations%
One for yes, zero for no, missing for unsure or no answer.
Describes reported awareness
Identified likely region%
One if the chosen region is the likely region, otherwise zero.
Describes reported awareness
Chosen regioncount
Zero: top left; one: top right; two: bottom left; three: bottom right.
Category code
Usable likely-region trialscount
Correct late acquisition trials with a response time from 100 to 6000 ms in the likely region.
Informational
Usable other-region trialscount
Correct late acquisition trials with a response time from 100 to 6000 ms in other regions.
Informational
Anticipationscount
Responses faster than 100 ms.
Informational
Omissionscount
Search trials without a direction response.
Informational
Trials scoredcount
Search trials in the scored run.
Informational
Planned trialscount
Number of search trials set before the run.
Informational

Use and evidence

66 papers from 2021 to 2025 name this task in their title or abstract, up 65% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 318 of 582 test families in our census. See the counts for every test.

2021 to 2025, the years gradedEarlier years
Papers per year naming the Location Probability Task, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 14; 2022: 6; 2023: 18; 2024: 14; 2025: 14 papers. Peak year 2023.051015202000: 0 papers2001: 0 papers2002: 2 papers2003: 0 papers2004: 0 papers2005: 0 papers2006: 3 papers2007: 0 papers2008: 1 papers2009: 4 papers2010: 3 papers2011: 1 papers2012: 8 papers2013: 7 papers2014: 8 papers2015: 7 papers2016: 7 papers2017: 10 papers2018: 7 papers2019: 6 papers2020: 10 papers2021: 14 papers2022: 6 papers2023: 18 papers2024: 14 papers2025: 14 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year naming the Location Probability Task, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 14; 2022: 6; 2023: 18; 2024: 14; 2025: 14 papers. Peak year 2023.051015202000: 0 papers2001: 0 papers2002: 2 papers2003: 0 papers2004: 0 papers2005: 0 papers2006: 3 papers2007: 0 papers2008: 1 papers2009: 4 papers2010: 3 papers2011: 1 papers2012: 8 papers2013: 7 papers2014: 8 papers2015: 7 papers2016: 7 papers2017: 10 papers2018: 7 papers2019: 6 papers2020: 10 papers2021: 14 papers2022: 6 papers2023: 18 papers2024: 14 papers2025: 14 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year whose title or abstract names this task (OpenAlex).
Show the numbers
YearPapers
202514
202414
202318
20226
202114
202010
20196
20187
201710
20167
20157
20148
20137
20128
20111
20103
20094
20081
20070
20063
20050
20040
20030
20022
20010
20000
D

Use grade D

30 to 99 papers from 2021 to 2025.

D

Evidence grade D

Little published measurement evidence found.

Papers on test-retest reliability
0
Papers on reliability or validity
8
Registered clinical studies using it as an outcome
1

Measured on ConductCognition

Pooled across the studies that feed our platform norms, by device group. A figure needs 50 or more people.

No pooled figure yet.

How the grades work

Use: A is 1,000 or more papers from 2021 to 2025, B 300 to 999, C 100 to 299, D 30 to 99 and E fewer than 30. Evidence: A means at least 25 papers report its test-retest reliability and at least 25 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome; B, at least 8 test-retest papers, and either 5 registered clinical studies or 150 reliability or validity papers; C, at least 2 test-retest papers, 30 reliability or validity papers or 3 registered clinical studies; D, little published measurement evidence found. The counts measure use. They include every paper that names the task in its title or abstract. Grades describe the published research on this task, not ConductCognition's version of it.

Source: ConductCognition test census 0.39.0, counted 8 November 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Task design

The trial sequence as the test runs in ConductCognition.

Search display
One left- or right-pointing T among eleven rotated L shapes on a 6 by 6 grid. Each region contains three items. Layouts are generated afresh.
Acquisition
Six blocks of 48 trials as standard. The target is in the likely region on 24 trials per block and each other region on 8. Left/right answers are balanced within every region. Researchers can choose 4 to 8 acquisition blocks.
Transfer
Two final blocks of 48 trials, with 12 targets per region per block. No announcement reveals the probability change.
Timing and response
Twelve practice trials give feedback. A 500 ms fixation precedes search; responses have a 6000 ms limit. Press F/J, click or tap a direction. Rest between blocks.
Scores and awareness
The main score compares mean correct response time in other and likely regions in the last half of acquisition. Early, transfer and nonrepeat contrasts, accuracy, omissions and two awareness answers are separate.
Data
Save the seed, likely region, phase, block, target position and direction, distractor positions and rotations, previous target region, response, input, time and display size.

This version uses a shorter fixed session and a compact browser display instead of the published laboratory protocol. No repeated layout is deliberately trained. Compare the same devices and settings. Scores support research and do not diagnose.

Quality checks

Each session is marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason, before you see its scores.

Scored rows: location_probability_search from the scored run. Left/right answers have chance level 1/2. Below chance invalidates and not above chance is flagged. One direction on 90% of answers invalidates when accuracy is not above chance. Awareness questions are not search trials. Fewer than 20 usable trials per region type in the late acquisition blocks and incomplete runs are flagged. Missed responses and responses under 100 ms follow the timed-test rule.

Why these rules

The target direction is balanced within regions, so accuracy can be checked against chance. Probability learning is a reaction-time contrast; an absent or reversed effect and an incorrect awareness answer do not invalidate a run.

No percentile. Scores and quality flags only.

Running this test

Settings you can change

SettingStandardAllowed
Search blocks before transfer64 to 8

Yearly plans can change settings within these limits. Free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

How test settings work

Need a setting this test does not have?

Devices and languages

  • Timed test: participants need a desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad. Participant devices
  • Languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese.
  • Available on: Every plan, including the free plan.
  • No percentile. Scores and quality flags only. How norms work
  • Recruiting online? See the setup guides for Prolific, Sona Systems, CloudResearch Connect and Qualtrics.

Cite and describe

Methods text, with the standard settings

Participants completed the Location Probability Task in a web browser (ConductCognition task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0; Jiang, Swallow, Rosenbaum and Herzig, 2013), with the standard settings (search blocks before transfer: 6). The main score was probability cueing (mean correct response time in other regions minus the likely region, in the last half of acquisition blocks).

ConductCognition versions: task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0. Every export records the versions each session used, for a methods section.

  • Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., Rosenbaum, G. M., & Herzig, C. (2013). Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027611Acquisition and extinction of a likely-region search advantage, with awareness questions after search.

Source papers

  • Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., Rosenbaum, G. M., & Herzig, C. (2013). Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 87-99.Paradigm source, Adults

Questions

How long does the Location Probability Task take?

About 12 to 18 minutes, as listed in the test library.

What device does a participant need?

Timed test: participants need a desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad. The browser must be Chrome, Edge, Firefox or Safari.

What scores does it produce?

Probability cueing, Early cueing, Transfer cueing, Cueing without immediate repeats, Likely-region response time, Other-region response time, Search accuracy, Likely-region accuracy, Other-region accuracy, Noticed uneven locations, Identified likely region, Chosen region, Usable likely-region trials, Usable other-region trials, Anticipations, Omissions, Trials scored and Planned trials. Each session is also marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason.

How widely is the Location Probability Task used in research?

66 papers from 2021 to 2025 name it in their title or abstract, up 65% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 318 of 582 test families in the ConductCognition test census (use grade D). Source: ConductCognition test census 0.39.0, counted 8 November 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

How much reliability evidence does the Location Probability Task have?

In the published research, 0 papers report its test-retest reliability and 1 registered clinical study uses it as an outcome (evidence grade D in the ConductCognition test census).

Does it report a percentile?

No. Scores and quality flags only.

Which settings can a researcher change?

Search blocks before transfer (4 to 8). Settings can be changed on yearly plans; free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

Which languages can participants use?

Participants can take this test in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese. English is on every plan, and the other languages come with yearly plans. Have a native speaker read the machine-translated text before launch.

Is this a clinical test?

No. ConductCognition is for research use only. It runs, scores and exports the test; clinical interpretation is outside the platform.

Every test: the full test list.

New tests and features, about once a month. Unsubscribe at any time.

Run this test in your next study

Start free with 10 free participants on any test, then use participant credits or a yearly plan.

Start free

Related tests

Contextual Cueing TaskVisual Search TestPosner Cueing
ConductCognition

Hosted browser-native cognitive testing for academic and commercial research workflows.

A product of ConductScience, Inc.

Tests

  • All cognitive tests
  • Test batteries
  • Use and evidence
  • Test norms
  • Trail Making Test
  • N-Back Task
  • Automated scoring
  • Study design
  • New tests by email

Guides

  • Methods and questions
  • Blog
  • Recruitment setup
  • Participant devices
  • Prolific
  • Sona Systems
  • CloudResearch Connect
  • Qualtrics

Use cases

  • Student participant pools
  • Aging and dementia research
  • Clinical trials
  • US clinical research
  • Remote testing

Compare and buy

  • Pricing
  • Compare platforms
  • Offline edition
  • FAQ

Trust

  • Study Quality Monitor
  • HIPAA-ready testing
  • Data export
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Data Policy

Company

  • ConductScience
  • Affiliate Program
© 2026 ConductScience, Inc. Research use only.