ConductCognition
  • Domains

    Tests

    • Processing speed45
    • Attention115
    • Working memory51
    • Executive function147
    • Episodic memory72
    • Response inhibition10
    • Social cognition79
    • Language44

    Most used

    Evidence

    1. Verbal Fluency TestGradeA
    2. Stroop Color-Word TestGradeA
    3. Trail Making TestGradeA
    4. N-Back TaskGradeA
    5. Go/No-Go TaskGradeA
    6. Digit Span TestGradeA
    7. Symbol Coding TestGradeA
    8. Verbal Learning TestGradeA
    REDTry it nowStroop Color-Word Test
    All 563 tests

    Browse by

    • Phone302
    • Tablet335
    • Untimed338
    • Up to 5 minutes71
    • Evidence grade A41
  • First studies

    Grade, length

    • Reaction Time StudyGradeA7 min
    • Pilot ScreeningGradeA15 min
    • Medication StudiesGradeA−26 min
    • Language-Minimized ScreeningGradeA−30 min

    Age groups

    • Older Adult Executive SpeedGradeA20 min
    • School-AgeGradeA−33 min

    Memory

    • At-Home MemoryGradeA26 min
    • Working Memory and LearningGradeA−19 min
    • Associative MemoryGradeB32 min
    • Working Memory CapacityGradeB34 min

    Language and perception

    • LanguageGradeA−33 min
    • Visual PerceptionGradeB27 min
    • Listening and Auditory ProcessingGradeB31 min

    Executive function and attention

    • Executive ControlGradeA18 min
    • Attention and ImpulsivityGradeA−26 min
    • Visual AttentionGradeB27 min
    • Creativity and Flexible ThinkingGradeB30 min
    • Reasoning and SpatialGradeB32 min

    Movement

    • Motor and AttentionGradeA−29 min
    • Motor LearningGradeB34 min

    Behavior, mood and choice

    • Food Choice and Self-ControlGradeA−29 min
    • Sleep and FatigueGradeB23 min
    • Social CognitionGradeB23 min
    • Impulsivity and Substance UseGradeB26 min
    • Emotion and MoodGradeB28 min
    • Decisions and RewardGradeB29 min
    All 26 batteries

    Find one

    Up to 15 minutes2Up to 30 minutes19Phone8
    Test order labBattery gradesHow batteries work
  • Use and evidence

    • Overview
    • Compare all 563 tests
    • Test-retest
    • Reliability and validity
    • Battery grades26
    • Download and cite

    Clinical trials

    • Overview
    • By condition25
    • By test102
    • Trial design benchmark
    • Cognitive outcomes, 2026

    Conditions

    Registered studies

    • Dementia and Alzheimer's1,673
    • Aging, frailty and exercise1,398
    • Depression and bipolar disorder1,249
    • Stroke1,233
    • Substance use and addiction904
    • Parkinson's disease893
    • Cancer761
    All 25 conditions
    16,423Registered studies name a cognitive test in an outcome measure11,730 name a test you can run hereExplore the studies
  • 1

    Build

    • Study design
    • Customize tests
    • Repeat visits
    • Study cost calculator
    2

    Recruit

    • Recruitment setup
    • Prolific
    • Sona Systems
    • CloudResearch Connect
    • Qualtrics
    3

    Run

    • Remote testing
    • Participant devices
    • Phone timing check
    • Offline edition
    4

    Results

    • Automated scoring
    • Test norms
    • Study Quality Monitor
    • Data export
    Platform overview

    Compliance

    • HIPAA-ready testing
    • US clinical research
    • Data Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Research areas

    Tests used in each

    • Aging and dementia188
    • Decisions and reward110
    • Child development and education87
    • Language and bilingualism66
    • Social behavior65
    • Psychiatric groups35
    • Training and intervention29
    • Mood, anxiety and trauma25
    • Substance use and impulsivity25
    • Neurological and movement research19
    • Brain injury and concussion14
    • Sleep and fatigue14
    • ADHD11
    • Eating and obesity8
    • Medication and drug trials8

    Research settings

    • Student participant pools
    • Teaching a class
    • Clinical trials
    • US clinical research
    • Sites without internet
    Planning a study?
  • Methods

    • How evidence grades work
    • How test batteries work
    • How test order works
    Methods and questions

    Help

    • FAQ
    • Recruitment guides
    • Compare platforms

    Updates

    • Blog
    • New tests by email
    Latest post10 November 2026What you can do in ConductCognition todayA short tour of ConductCognition as it stands on 10 November. After this, we'll post when something changes how you run a study.Read the post
  • Pricing
Start Free
Log In
Log InStart Free
  1. Home
  2. /Tests
  3. /Lane Keeping Task

Processing Speed

Lane Keeping Task

Also called: standard deviation of lateral position, SDLP, simulated lane keeping

Measure how steadily people keep a car in its lane on a winding road, with the weaving of the car (SDLP), mean lateral position and lane departures.

7-9 minTimed: desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad

Create a study with this test

Free to start: 10 free participants per account, then $0.99 per participant for academic research, or any yearly plan. Try it here first, with no account.

Papers, 2021 to 2025
94
Evidence grade
C
Registered clinical studies
59
How these are counted
←
→
Weaving (SDLP) and lane departures
Keep a car steady in its lane
  • Overview
  • Evidence
  • Task design
  • Quality checks
  • Settings
  • Cite
  • Questions

What it measures

Measures how steadily people keep a car in its lane. Participants steer a car along a winding road at a set speed while gusts of wind push it sideways. The main score is the standard deviation of lateral position, the weaving of the car.

Constructs

  • Visuomotor control
  • Sustained attention
  • Lane keeping

Research uses

  • Human factors research
  • Driving simulation studies
  • Within-study group comparison

How the paradigm works

The Lane Keeping Task measures how steadily people keep a car in its lane. The car runs at a constant 95 km/h along a winding two-lane road, and gusts of side wind push it sideways now and then. Participants steer with the arrow keys or, as a study setting, the mouse, and keep a steady position in the lane wherever they like. The main score is the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), the weaving of the car, as in the on-the-road driving test of O'Hanlon (1984) and its standard procedure (Verster and Roth, 2011), here as a drawn, simulated drive.

More about the paradigm

The standard session has a 45-second practice drive, then one continuous drive of 5 minutes; studies can set 2 to 20 minutes. The road's bends and the gusts are drawn from the session's seed, and the car's lateral position is saved five times a second. The drive pauses and blanks if the window loses focus. Desktop or laptop with a keyboard, or with a mouse for mouse steering.

Scores

Weaving (SDLP)cm
Standard deviation of the car's lateral position over the drive, from positions saved every 200 ms.
Lower means steadier lane keeping
Mean Lateral Positioncm
Mean distance of the car's center from the center of its lane; positive is to the right.
Describes where in the lane the car was kept
Lane Departurescount
Times the car's body crossed a line of its lane, from the saved positions.
Lower means fewer departures
Time Out of Lane%
Share of saved positions with the car's body over a line of its lane.
Lower means more time in the lane
Weaving, First Halfcm
SDLP over the first half of the drive.
Compare with the second half
Weaving, Second Halfcm
SDLP over the second half of the drive.
Higher than the first half means the weaving grew over the drive
Pausescount
Drive interruptions after focus loss, hiding the tab, resizing or the pointer leaving the page.
Lower supports interpretation
Long Frames%
Share of animation frames longer than 50 ms.
Above 0.05 is flagged
Driven Timeseconds
Drive time covered by the saved positions.
Informational
Planned Timeseconds
Planned length of the drive.
Informational

Use and evidence

94 papers from 2021 to 2025 name this task in their title or abstract, about the same as from 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 268 of 632 test families in our census. See the counts for every test.

2021 to 2025, the years gradedEarlier years
Papers per year naming the Lane Keeping Task, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 21; 2022: 19; 2023: 18; 2024: 15; 2025: 21 papers. Peak year 2018.01020302000: 2 papers2001: 3 papers2002: 3 papers2003: 1 papers2004: 7 papers2005: 6 papers2006: 8 papers2007: 3 papers2008: 4 papers2009: 11 papers2010: 13 papers2011: 14 papers2012: 11 papers2013: 23 papers2014: 22 papers2015: 14 papers2016: 15 papers2017: 20 papers2018: 27 papers2019: 10 papers2020: 22 papers2021: 21 papers2022: 19 papers2023: 18 papers2024: 15 papers2025: 21 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year naming the Lane Keeping Task, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 21; 2022: 19; 2023: 18; 2024: 15; 2025: 21 papers. Peak year 2018.01020302000: 2 papers2001: 3 papers2002: 3 papers2003: 1 papers2004: 7 papers2005: 6 papers2006: 8 papers2007: 3 papers2008: 4 papers2009: 11 papers2010: 13 papers2011: 14 papers2012: 11 papers2013: 23 papers2014: 22 papers2015: 14 papers2016: 15 papers2017: 20 papers2018: 27 papers2019: 10 papers2020: 22 papers2021: 21 papers2022: 19 papers2023: 18 papers2024: 15 papers2025: 21 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year whose title or abstract names this task (OpenAlex).
Show the numbers
YearPapers
202521
202415
202318
202219
202121
202022
201910
201827
201720
201615
201514
201422
201323
201211
201114
201013
200911
20084
20073
20068
20056
20047
20031
20023
20013
20002
D

Use grade D

30 to 99 papers from 2021 to 2025.

C

Evidence grade C

At least 2 test-retest papers, 30 reliability or validity papers or 3 registered clinical studies.

Papers on test-retest reliability
0
Papers on reliability or validity
25
Registered clinical studies using it as an outcome
59

See which registered studies use it

Measured on ConductCognition

Pooled across the studies that feed our platform norms, by device group. A figure needs 50 or more people.

No pooled figure yet.

Note on the counts: most counted studies use driving simulators or real cars, and most trial listings test medicines, alcohol or sleep loss.

How the grades work

Use: A is 1,000 or more papers from 2021 to 2025, B 300 to 999, C 100 to 299, D 30 to 99 and E fewer than 30. Evidence: A means at least 25 papers report its test-retest reliability and at least 25 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome; B, at least 8 test-retest papers, and either 5 registered clinical studies or 150 reliability or validity papers; C, at least 2 test-retest papers, 30 reliability or validity papers or 3 registered clinical studies; D, little published measurement evidence found. The counts measure use. They include every paper that names the task in its title or abstract. Grades describe the published research on this task, not ConductCognition's version of it.

Source: ConductCognition test census 0.44.0, counted 12 November 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Task design

The trial sequence as the test runs in ConductCognition.

Road
A drawn two-lane road at a constant 95 km/h, seen from behind the participant's car in the right lane, with gentle bends and gusts of side wind drawn from the session seed. No traffic.
Drive
One continuous drive of 5 minutes as standard, with 2 to 20 minutes available, after a 45-second practice drive with feedback.
Steering
Arrow keys as standard: a held key steers, and the steering returns when it is released. As a setting, the mouse: the pointer's distance left or right of the middle of the road sets the steering.
Instruction
Keep a steady position in the lane, wherever feels natural, as the standard procedure of the on-the-road test asks.
Recording
The car's lateral position every 200 ms, in cm from the center of its lane, with the road's bends and the gusts.
Scores
SDLP, mean lateral position, lane departures, time out of the lane, the SDLP of each half of the drive, and frame timing.

A simulated version of the on-the-road test: a drawn road, minutes rather than an hour, and keys or a mouse rather than a steering wheel. Scores describe lane keeping in this drive and do not measure fitness to drive or the effect of a medicine or alcohol on a person. Compare only drives of the same length and steering. No percentile output.

Quality checks

Each session is marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason, before you see its scores.

Scored rows: the scored drive. A drive with no lateral positions invalidates; an unfinished drive, a car out of its lane more than half the time, three or more pauses and long frames are flagged. A drive without any steering is a missed response under the platform's timed-test rule.

Why these rules

Missed responses and responses under 100 ms keep the platform's timed-test rule: more than max(3, 25%) missed responses or more than max(2, 20%) responses under 100 ms invalidate, and any is flagged. A response under 100 ms cannot be a reaction to the stimulus. The weaving of the car is meaningful only when the participant steered: without steering, the wind and the bends alone move the car.

No percentile. Scores and quality flags only.

Running this test

Settings you can change

SettingStandardAllowed
Drive length (minutes)52 to 20
SteeringArrow keys (standard)Arrow keys (standard), Mouse

Yearly plans can change settings within these limits. Free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

How test settings work

Need a setting this test does not have?

Devices and languages

  • Timed test: participants need a desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad. Participant devices
  • Languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese.
  • Available on: Every plan, including the free plan.
  • No percentile. Scores and quality flags only. How norms work
  • Recruiting online? See the setup guides for Prolific, Sona Systems, CloudResearch Connect and Qualtrics.

Cite and describe

Methods text, with the standard settings

Participants completed the Lane Keeping Task in a web browser (ConductCognition task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0; O'Hanlon, 1984), with the standard settings (drive length (minutes): 5; steering: Arrow keys). The main score was weaving (SDLP; standard deviation of the car's lateral position over the drive, from positions saved every 200 ms).

ConductCognition versions: task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0. Every export records the versions each session used, for a methods section.

  • O'Hanlon, J. F. (1984). Driving performance under the influence of drugs: rationale for, and application of, a new test. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 18(S1), 121S-129S. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02590.xThe on-the-road driving test, from which the weaving measure comes.
  • Verster, J. C., & Roth, T. (2011). Standard operation procedures for conducting the on-the-road driving test, and measurement of the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP). International Journal of General Medicine, 4, 359-371. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S19639The standard procedure: a constant speed, a steady position the driver chooses, the lateral position sampled through the drive, and SDLP over the whole drive.

Source papers

  • O'Hanlon, J. F. (1984). Driving performance under the influence of drugs: rationale for, and application of, a new test. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 18(S1), 121S-129S.Paradigm source, Adults

Questions

How long does the Lane Keeping Task take?

About 7 to 9 minutes, as listed in the test library.

What device does a participant need?

Timed test: participants need a desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad. The browser must be Chrome, Edge, Firefox or Safari.

What scores does it produce?

Weaving (SDLP), Mean Lateral Position, Lane Departures, Time Out of Lane, Weaving, First Half, Weaving, Second Half, Pauses, Long Frames, Driven Time and Planned Time. Each session is also marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason.

How widely is the Lane Keeping Task used in research?

94 papers from 2021 to 2025 name it in their title or abstract, about the same as from 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 268 of 632 test families in the ConductCognition test census (use grade D). Source: ConductCognition test census 0.44.0, counted 12 November 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

How much reliability evidence does the Lane Keeping Task have?

In the published research, 0 papers report its test-retest reliability and 59 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome (evidence grade C in the ConductCognition test census).

Does it report a percentile?

No. Scores and quality flags only.

Which settings can a researcher change?

Drive length (minutes) (2 to 20) and steering (Arrow keys (standard), Mouse). Settings can be changed on yearly plans; free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

Which languages can participants use?

Participants can take this test in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese. English is on every plan, and the other languages come with yearly plans. Have a native speaker read the machine-translated text before launch.

Is this a clinical test?

No. ConductCognition is for research use only. It runs, scores and exports the test; clinical interpretation is outside the platform.

Every test: the full test list.

New tests and features, about once a month. Unsubscribe at any time.

Run this test in your next study

Start free with 10 free participants on any test, then use participant credits or a yearly plan.

Start free

Related tests

Pursuit Tracking TestTakeover TaskRoad Hazard Task
ConductCognition

Hosted browser-native cognitive testing for academic and commercial research workflows.

A product of ConductScience, Inc.

Tests

  • All cognitive tests
  • Test batteries
  • Use and evidence
  • Test norms
  • Trail Making Test
  • N-Back Task
  • Automated scoring
  • Study design
  • New tests by email

Guides

  • Methods and questions
  • Blog
  • Recruitment setup
  • Participant devices
  • Prolific
  • Sona Systems
  • CloudResearch Connect
  • Qualtrics

Use cases

  • Student participant pools
  • Aging and dementia research
  • Clinical trials
  • US clinical research
  • Remote testing

Compare and buy

  • Pricing
  • Compare platforms
  • Offline edition
  • FAQ

Trust

  • Study Quality Monitor
  • HIPAA-ready testing
  • Data export
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Data Policy

Company

  • ConductScience
  • Affiliate Program
© 2026 ConductScience, Inc. Research use only.