ConductCognition
  • Domains

    Tests

    • Processing speed43
    • Attention113
    • Working memory50
    • Executive function143
    • Episodic memory72
    • Response inhibition9
    • Social cognition75
    • Language42

    Most used

    Evidence

    1. Verbal Fluency TestGradeA
    2. Stroop Color-Word TestGradeA
    3. Trail Making TestGradeA
    4. N-Back TaskGradeA
    5. Go/No-Go TaskGradeA
    6. Digit Span TestGradeA
    7. Symbol Coding TestGradeA
    8. Verbal Learning TestGradeA
    REDTry it nowStroop Color-Word Test
    All 547 tests

    Browse by

    • Phone290
    • Tablet323
    • Untimed326
    • Up to 5 minutes69
    • Evidence grade A40
  • First studies

    Grade, length

    • Reaction Time StudyGradeA7 min
    • Pilot ScreeningGradeA15 min
    • Medication StudiesGradeA−26 min
    • Language-Minimized ScreeningGradeA−30 min

    Age groups

    • Older Adult Executive SpeedGradeA20 min
    • School-AgeGradeA−33 min

    Memory

    • At-Home MemoryGradeA26 min
    • Working Memory and LearningGradeA−19 min
    • Associative MemoryGradeB32 min
    • Working Memory CapacityGradeB34 min

    Language and perception

    • LanguageGradeA−33 min
    • Visual PerceptionGradeB27 min
    • Listening and Auditory ProcessingGradeB31 min

    Executive function and attention

    • Executive ControlGradeA18 min
    • Attention and ImpulsivityGradeA−26 min
    • Visual AttentionGradeB27 min
    • Creativity and Flexible ThinkingGradeB30 min
    • Reasoning and SpatialGradeB32 min

    Movement

    • Motor and AttentionGradeA−29 min
    • Motor LearningGradeB34 min

    Behavior, mood and choice

    • Food Choice and Self-ControlGradeA−29 min
    • Sleep and FatigueGradeB23 min
    • Social CognitionGradeB23 min
    • Impulsivity and Substance UseGradeB26 min
    • Emotion and MoodGradeB28 min
    • Decisions and RewardGradeB29 min
    All 26 batteries

    Find one

    Up to 15 minutes2Up to 30 minutes19Phone8
    Test order labBattery gradesHow batteries work
  • Use and evidence

    • Overview
    • Compare all 547 tests
    • Test-retest
    • Reliability and validity
    • Battery grades26
    • Download and cite

    Clinical trials

    • Overview
    • By condition25
    • By test101
    • Trial design benchmark
    • Cognitive outcomes, 2026

    Conditions

    Registered studies

    • Dementia and Alzheimer's1,673
    • Aging, frailty and exercise1,398
    • Depression and bipolar disorder1,247
    • Stroke1,233
    • Substance use and addiction895
    • Parkinson's disease892
    • Cancer760
    All 25 conditions
    16,361Registered studies name a cognitive test in an outcome measure11,688 name a test you can run hereExplore the studies
  • 1

    Build

    • Study design
    • Customize tests
    • Repeat visits
    • Study cost calculator
    2

    Recruit

    • Recruitment setup
    • Prolific
    • Sona Systems
    • CloudResearch Connect
    • Qualtrics
    3

    Run

    • Remote testing
    • Participant devices
    • Phone timing check
    • Offline edition
    4

    Results

    • Automated scoring
    • Test norms
    • Study Quality Monitor
    • Data export
    Platform overview

    Compliance

    • HIPAA-ready testing
    • US clinical research
    • Data Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Research areas

    Tests used in each

    • Aging and dementia188
    • Decisions and reward105
    • Child development and education87
    • Language and bilingualism64
    • Social behavior62
    • Psychiatric groups35
    • Training and intervention28
    • Mood, anxiety and trauma25
    • Substance use and impulsivity25
    • Neurological and movement research19
    • Brain injury and concussion14
    • Sleep and fatigue14
    • ADHD11
    • Eating and obesity8
    • Medication and drug trials8

    Research settings

    • Student participant pools
    • Teaching a class
    • Clinical trials
    • US clinical research
    • Sites without internet
    Planning a study?
  • Methods

    • How evidence grades work
    • How test batteries work
    • How test order works
    Methods and questions

    Help

    • FAQ
    • Recruitment guides
    • Compare platforms

    Updates

    • Blog
    • New tests by email
    Latest post10 November 2026What you can do in ConductCognition todayA short tour of ConductCognition as it stands on 10 November. After this, we'll post when something changes how you run a study.Read the post
  • Pricing
Start Free
Log In
Log InStart Free
  1. Home
  2. /Tests
  3. /Face Aftereffect Task

Attention

Face Aftereffect Task

Also called: face distortion aftereffect, figural face adaptation, normality judgments

Measure how viewing a distorted face shifts which faces look normal. Compare judgments before and after adaptation.

8-12 minTimed: desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad

Create a study with this test

Free to start: 10 free participants per account, then $0.99 per participant for academic research, or any yearly plan. Try it here first, with no account.

Papers, 2021 to 2025
74
Evidence grade
D
Registered clinical studies
0
How these are counted
Normal or distorted?
F · NormalJ · Distorted
Judge a face after looking at a distorted face
  • Overview
  • Evidence
  • Task design
  • Quality checks
  • Settings
  • Cite
  • Questions

What it measures

Measures how viewing a distorted face shifts what looks normal. Participants judge faces before and after looking at an expanded or contracted face. Scores show the shift toward the adapting distortion.

Constructs

  • Face adaptation
  • Perceived facial normality
  • Visual aftereffects

Research uses

  • Face perception research
  • Visual adaptation research

How the paradigm works

Viewing an expanded or contracted face can change which distortions look normal. This version compares fixed levels before and after adaptation. One London Set person is selected from a pool of four; two other people appear in practice. Each of seven distortion levels appears four times per block by default, or six times. The seed shuffles levels and chooses the adapting direction unless the study fixes it.

More about the paradigm

Both blocks start with a 30-second exposure, followed by five-second exposures between judgments. Baseline exposures show a cross on gray; adapted exposures show the distorted face. After a 500 ms blank, a test face appears for 1,000 ms. The face disappears before the five-second F/J answer window. Actual display durations are saved. Practice explains the controls without labeling a subjective answer right or wrong.

The primary score is the shift in the rate-weighted center of distortions judged normal, signed toward the adapter. Choices under 100 ms are excluded. A center is blank when any level has fewer than two usable answers or the normal-response profile is flat. This is a short, fixed-level adaptation with our own warps, rather than the source’s two-dimensional staircase. Judgments describe visual impressions, not the people pictured. Norms are off.

Scores

Aftereffect shiftpoints
Adapted minus baseline normality center, multiplied by adapter direction. Positive means a shift toward the adapting distortion. Units are Gaussian warp amplitude times 100.
Informational
Signed distortion shiftpoints
Adapted minus baseline center; positive means expansion.
Informational
Baseline normality centerpoints
Rate-weighted center of fixed distortions judged normal before adaptation. At least two usable answers per level and a non-flat profile are required.
Informational
Adapted normality centerpoints
Rate-weighted center after adaptation, on the same distortion scale.
Informational
Normal judgments before adaptation%
Percentage of usable baseline judgments answered normal.
Informational
Normal judgments after adaptation%
Percentage of usable adapted judgments answered normal.
Informational
Usable judgmentscount
Answered test judgments excluding choices under 100 ms.
Informational
Planned judgmentscount
56 or 84 judgments, excluding practice.
Informational
Median answer timems
Median time from disappearance of the test face to a usable answer.
Informational
Anticipationscount
Answers under 100 ms, excluded from the shift.
Informational
Missed judgmentscount
Test faces with no valid answer within five seconds.
Informational

Use and evidence

74 papers from 2021 to 2025 name this task in their title or abstract, up 3% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 292 of 582 test families in our census. See the counts for every test.

2021 to 2025, the years gradedEarlier years
Papers per year naming the Face Aftereffect Task, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 13; 2022: 10; 2023: 10; 2024: 12; 2025: 29 papers. Peak year 2010.0204060802000: 1 papers2001: 1 papers2002: 1 papers2003: 3 papers2004: 4 papers2005: 11 papers2006: 7 papers2007: 13 papers2008: 17 papers2009: 17 papers2010: 65 papers2011: 38 papers2012: 33 papers2013: 30 papers2014: 30 papers2015: 19 papers2016: 28 papers2017: 14 papers2018: 11 papers2019: 7 papers2020: 12 papers2021: 13 papers2022: 10 papers2023: 10 papers2024: 12 papers2025: 29 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year naming the Face Aftereffect Task, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 13; 2022: 10; 2023: 10; 2024: 12; 2025: 29 papers. Peak year 2010.0204060802000: 1 papers2001: 1 papers2002: 1 papers2003: 3 papers2004: 4 papers2005: 11 papers2006: 7 papers2007: 13 papers2008: 17 papers2009: 17 papers2010: 65 papers2011: 38 papers2012: 33 papers2013: 30 papers2014: 30 papers2015: 19 papers2016: 28 papers2017: 14 papers2018: 11 papers2019: 7 papers2020: 12 papers2021: 13 papers2022: 10 papers2023: 10 papers2024: 12 papers2025: 29 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year whose title or abstract names this task (OpenAlex).
Show the numbers
YearPapers
202529
202412
202310
202210
202113
202012
20197
201811
201714
201628
201519
201430
201330
201233
201138
201065
200917
200817
200713
20067
200511
20044
20033
20021
20011
20001
D

Use grade D

30 to 99 papers from 2021 to 2025.

D

Evidence grade D

Little published measurement evidence found.

Papers on test-retest reliability
1
Papers on reliability or validity
12
Registered clinical studies using it as an outcome
0

Measured on ConductCognition

Pooled across the studies that feed our platform norms, by device group. A figure needs 50 or more people.

No pooled figure yet.

Note on the counts: Fixed one-axis normality judgments; impressions, not traits. Norms off..

How the grades work

Use: A is 1,000 or more papers from 2021 to 2025, B 300 to 999, C 100 to 299, D 30 to 99 and E fewer than 30. Evidence: A means at least 25 papers report its test-retest reliability and at least 25 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome; B, at least 8 test-retest papers, and either 5 registered clinical studies or 150 reliability or validity papers; C, at least 2 test-retest papers, 30 reliability or validity papers or 3 registered clinical studies; D, little published measurement evidence found. The counts measure use. They include every paper that names the task in its title or abstract. Grades describe the published research on this task, not ConductCognition's version of it.

Source: ConductCognition test census 0.39.0, counted 10 November 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Task design

The trial sequence as the test runs in ConductCognition.

Faces
One person selected by the session seed from four London Set neutral front photographs. Two separate people appear in practice. Our code expands or contracts central features while keeping the outer head almost unchanged.
Levels
Seven fixed distortion levels: -60, -40, -20, 0, 20, 40 and 60 in warp-amplitude points. The adapter is -80 or +80. These are image-warp settings, not percentages of face size.
Judgments
56 test judgments by default: 4 repeats per level in each of two blocks. The longer setting uses 6 repeats, for 84 judgments. Baseline always precedes adaptation; the seed shuffles each pass.
Timing
Each block starts with 30 seconds of gray or the adapting face, then uses 5-second exposures before later tests. A 500 ms blank precedes each 1,000 ms test face. Answer with F or J after it disappears, within 5 seconds. Frame durations are recorded.
Scoring
Aftereffect shift is the adapted minus baseline rate-weighted center of normal judgments, signed toward the adapter. A center needs two usable answers at every level and a non-flat profile. Responses under 100 ms are excluded.

These judgments describe visual impressions, not the people pictured. This version uses London Set photographs, one distortion axis, fixed levels and shorter adaptation than the published method. Norms are off. The pool of four test and two practice people overlaps with Face Memory Test (3), Face-Name Memory Task (3), Face Matching Task (6), Chimeric Faces Task (2), Part-Whole Face Task (2), Thatcher Illusion Task (1), Two-Tone Pictures Task (2), Verbal Overshadowing Task (4), Face Impressions Task (6), Real or AI Face Task (6), Uncanny Valley Task (3). One test person is selected per session. Counts include practice and foils in the other tasks. Separate sessions or counterbalance task order when combining face tasks. All 6 people in this pool also appear in the Group Faces Task's stimulus pool.

Quality checks

Each session is marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason, before you see its scores.

Scored rows: face_aftereffect_test from the run with the most unique judgments. Normality has no correct answer. Incomplete runs or an undefined normality center are flagged. Missed responses and responses under 100 ms follow the timed-test rule.

Why these rules

There is no correct option to compare with chance, so accuracy is not judged against chance. The shift describes judgments within this session. Missed responses and responses under 100 ms keep the platform's timed-test rule: more than max(3, 25%) missed responses or more than max(2, 20%) responses under 100 ms invalidate, and any is flagged. A response under 100 ms cannot be a reaction to the stimulus.

No percentile. Scores and quality flags only.

Running this test

Settings you can change

SettingStandardAllowed
Repeats per distortion4 (56 judgments, standard)4 (56 judgments, standard), 6 (84 judgments)
Adapting distortionChosen by session seedChosen by session seed, Expanded, Contracted

Yearly plans can change settings within these limits. Free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

How test settings work

Need a setting this test does not have?

Devices and languages

  • Timed test: participants need a desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad. Participant devices
  • Languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese.
  • Available on: Every plan, including the free plan.
  • No percentile. Scores and quality flags only. How norms work
  • Recruiting online? See the setup guides for Prolific, Sona Systems, CloudResearch Connect and Qualtrics.

Cite and describe

Methods text, with the standard settings

Participants completed the Face Aftereffect Task in a web browser (ConductCognition task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0; Webster and MacLin, 1999), with the standard settings (repeats per distortion: 4 (56 judgments, standard); adapting distortion: Chosen by session seed). The main score was aftereffect shift (adapted minus baseline normality center, multiplied by adapter direction).

ConductCognition versions: task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0. Every export records the versions each session used, for a methods section.

  • Webster, M. A., & MacLin, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 647-653. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212974Gaussian distortion and normal-or-distorted judgments before and after adaptation.

Source papers

    Questions

    How long does the Face Aftereffect Task take?

    About 8 to 12 minutes, as listed in the test library.

    What device does a participant need?

    Timed test: participants need a desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad. The browser must be Chrome, Edge, Firefox or Safari.

    What scores does it produce?

    Aftereffect shift, Signed distortion shift, Baseline normality center, Adapted normality center, Normal judgments before adaptation, Normal judgments after adaptation, Usable judgments, Planned judgments, Median answer time, Anticipations and Missed judgments. Each session is also marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason.

    How widely is the Face Aftereffect Task used in research?

    74 papers from 2021 to 2025 name it in their title or abstract, up 3% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 292 of 582 test families in the ConductCognition test census (use grade D). Source: ConductCognition test census 0.39.0, counted 10 November 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

    How much reliability evidence does the Face Aftereffect Task have?

    In the published research, 1 paper reports its test-retest reliability and 0 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome (evidence grade D in the ConductCognition test census).

    Does it report a percentile?

    No. Scores and quality flags only.

    Which settings can a researcher change?

    Repeats per distortion (4 (56 judgments, standard), 6 (84 judgments)) and adapting distortion (Chosen by session seed, Expanded, Contracted). Settings can be changed on yearly plans; free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

    Which languages can participants use?

    Participants can take this test in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese. English is on every plan, and the other languages come with yearly plans. Have a native speaker read the machine-translated text before launch.

    Is this a clinical test?

    No. ConductCognition is for research use only. It runs, scores and exports the test; clinical interpretation is outside the platform.

    Every test: the full test list.

    New tests and features, about once a month. Unsubscribe at any time.

    Run this test in your next study

    Start free with 10 free participants on any test, then use participant credits or a yearly plan.

    Start free

    Related tests

    Motion Aftereffect TaskComposite Face TaskFace Impressions Task
    ConductCognition

    Hosted browser-native cognitive testing for academic and commercial research workflows.

    A product of ConductScience, Inc.

    Tests

    • All cognitive tests
    • Test batteries
    • Use and evidence
    • Test norms
    • Trail Making Test
    • N-Back Task
    • Automated scoring
    • Study design
    • New tests by email

    Guides

    • Methods and questions
    • Blog
    • Recruitment setup
    • Participant devices
    • Prolific
    • Sona Systems
    • CloudResearch Connect
    • Qualtrics

    Use cases

    • Student participant pools
    • Aging and dementia research
    • Clinical trials
    • US clinical research
    • Remote testing

    Compare and buy

    • Pricing
    • Compare platforms
    • Offline edition
    • FAQ

    Trust

    • Study Quality Monitor
    • HIPAA-ready testing
    • Data export
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Data Policy

    Company

    • ConductScience
    • Affiliate Program
    © 2026 ConductScience, Inc. Research use only.