ConductCognition
  • Domains

    Tests

    • Processing speed43
    • Attention113
    • Working memory50
    • Executive function143
    • Episodic memory72
    • Response inhibition9
    • Social cognition75
    • Language42

    Most used

    Evidence

    1. Verbal Fluency TestGradeA
    2. Stroop Color-Word TestGradeA
    3. Trail Making TestGradeA
    4. N-Back TaskGradeA
    5. Go/No-Go TaskGradeA
    6. Digit Span TestGradeA
    7. Symbol Coding TestGradeA
    8. Verbal Learning TestGradeA
    REDTry it nowStroop Color-Word Test
    All 547 tests

    Browse by

    • Phone290
    • Tablet323
    • Untimed326
    • Up to 5 minutes69
    • Evidence grade A40
  • First studies

    Grade, length

    • Reaction Time StudyGradeA7 min
    • Pilot ScreeningGradeA15 min
    • Medication StudiesGradeA−26 min
    • Language-Minimized ScreeningGradeA−30 min

    Age groups

    • Older Adult Executive SpeedGradeA20 min
    • School-AgeGradeA−33 min

    Memory

    • At-Home MemoryGradeA26 min
    • Working Memory and LearningGradeA−19 min
    • Associative MemoryGradeB32 min
    • Working Memory CapacityGradeB34 min

    Language and perception

    • LanguageGradeA−33 min
    • Visual PerceptionGradeB27 min
    • Listening and Auditory ProcessingGradeB31 min

    Executive function and attention

    • Executive ControlGradeA18 min
    • Attention and ImpulsivityGradeA−26 min
    • Visual AttentionGradeB27 min
    • Creativity and Flexible ThinkingGradeB30 min
    • Reasoning and SpatialGradeB32 min

    Movement

    • Motor and AttentionGradeA−29 min
    • Motor LearningGradeB34 min

    Behavior, mood and choice

    • Food Choice and Self-ControlGradeA−29 min
    • Sleep and FatigueGradeB23 min
    • Social CognitionGradeB23 min
    • Impulsivity and Substance UseGradeB26 min
    • Emotion and MoodGradeB28 min
    • Decisions and RewardGradeB29 min
    All 26 batteries

    Find one

    Up to 15 minutes2Up to 30 minutes19Phone8
    Test order labBattery gradesHow batteries work
  • Use and evidence

    • Overview
    • Compare all 547 tests
    • Test-retest
    • Reliability and validity
    • Battery grades26
    • Download and cite

    Clinical trials

    • Overview
    • By condition25
    • By test101
    • Trial design benchmark
    • Cognitive outcomes, 2026

    Conditions

    Registered studies

    • Dementia and Alzheimer's1,673
    • Aging, frailty and exercise1,398
    • Depression and bipolar disorder1,247
    • Stroke1,233
    • Substance use and addiction895
    • Parkinson's disease892
    • Cancer760
    All 25 conditions
    16,361Registered studies name a cognitive test in an outcome measure11,688 name a test you can run hereExplore the studies
  • 1

    Build

    • Study design
    • Customize tests
    • Repeat visits
    • Study cost calculator
    2

    Recruit

    • Recruitment setup
    • Prolific
    • Sona Systems
    • CloudResearch Connect
    • Qualtrics
    3

    Run

    • Remote testing
    • Participant devices
    • Phone timing check
    • Offline edition
    4

    Results

    • Automated scoring
    • Test norms
    • Study Quality Monitor
    • Data export
    Platform overview

    Compliance

    • HIPAA-ready testing
    • US clinical research
    • Data Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Research areas

    Tests used in each

    • Aging and dementia188
    • Decisions and reward105
    • Child development and education87
    • Language and bilingualism64
    • Social behavior62
    • Psychiatric groups35
    • Training and intervention28
    • Mood, anxiety and trauma25
    • Substance use and impulsivity25
    • Neurological and movement research19
    • Brain injury and concussion14
    • Sleep and fatigue14
    • ADHD11
    • Eating and obesity8
    • Medication and drug trials8

    Research settings

    • Student participant pools
    • Teaching a class
    • Clinical trials
    • US clinical research
    • Sites without internet
    Planning a study?
  • Methods

    • How evidence grades work
    • How test batteries work
    • How test order works
    Methods and questions

    Help

    • FAQ
    • Recruitment guides
    • Compare platforms

    Updates

    • Blog
    • New tests by email
    Latest post10 November 2026What you can do in ConductCognition todayA short tour of ConductCognition as it stands on 10 November. After this, we'll post when something changes how you run a study.Read the post
  • Pricing
Start Free
Log In
Log InStart Free
  1. Home
  2. /Batteries
  3. /Attention and Impulsivity Battery
  4. /Guide

Battery guide

Attention and Impulsivity Battery guide

Four tasks of sustained attention, response inhibition and interference control, for ADHD research.

Guide version
1.2.0
Battery version
1.0.0
Research use only

ConductCognition, https://conductcognition.com/batteries/attention-impulsivity/guide

Back to the battery

On this page

  1. What it measures
  2. Tests in order
  3. Time and devices
  4. Languages
  5. How to give it
  6. How each test is scored
  7. Session quality rules
  8. Published norms used
  9. How to cite

What it measures

Who it is for: ADHD research.

It measures Sustained attention, Action cancellation, Response inhibition and Interference control.

Attention: Keeping attention on a task and picking out what matters.

Response inhibition: Stopping or holding back a response.

Scores describe how a person performs on these tasks. Research use only.

Tests in order

The tests run in this order. A study started from the battery keeps the order and the settings.

1. Continuous Performance Test. Measures sustained attention by asking participants to respond to target letters and withhold responses to non-target letters across a continuous stream.

2. Stop-Signal Task. Measures action cancellation by asking participants to make speeded left/right responses and withhold the response when a stop signal appears.

3. Go/No-Go Task. Measures response inhibition by requiring participants to respond to 'go' stimuli and withhold responses to 'no-go' stimuli.

4. Eriksen Flanker Task. Measures selective attention and cognitive control by requiring participants to identify the direction of a central arrow while ignoring flanking arrows.

Tests in order
OrderTestDomainTime
1Continuous Performance TestAttention6 to 9 minutes
2Stop-Signal TaskResponse inhibition5 to 7 minutes
3Go/No-Go TaskResponse inhibition4 to 5 minutes
4Eriksen Flanker TaskAttention4 to 5 minutes

Time and devices

Allow about 26 minutes for the whole battery. The table gives each test's time.

The battery has timed tests. Participants need a desktop or laptop with a mouse or trackpad, and the timed tests run in full screen. Tablets and phones cannot run it.

On a desktop or laptop the screen must be at least 1024 by 700 pixels.

Participants need Chrome, Edge, Firefox or Safari.

Time and devices
TestTimingDevices
Continuous Performance TestTimedDesktop or laptop
Stop-Signal TaskTimedDesktop or laptop
Go/No-Go TaskTimedDesktop or laptop
Eriksen Flanker TaskTimedDesktop or laptop

Languages

Runs in all eight participant languages.

How to give it

Start a study from the battery in the app. The tests, their order and their settings are already set and stay fixed. If you change, reorder or customize a test, the study becomes a custom study and no longer carries the battery.

Each test opens with its instructions. Participants see these:

Continuous Performance Test: Press the spacebar when you see the target letter X. Do not press for other letters. Stay focused throughout the full stream.

Stop-Signal Task: Respond quickly to left and right arrows. If the arrow turns red, try to stop yourself and do not press a key.

Go/No-Go Task: Press the spacebar when you see a GREEN circle (Go). Do NOT press anything when you see a RED circle (No-Go). Respond as quickly and accurately as you can.

Eriksen Flanker Task: Focus on the MIDDLE arrow and indicate its direction. Press the LEFT arrow key if the middle arrow points left, or the RIGHT arrow key if it points right. Ignore the surrounding arrows.

How to give it
StepBefore you invite participants
1Decide which participant details your analysis needs, such as study group or medication taken that day, and collect them with your own forms.
2Ask participants to use a desktop or laptop in a quiet room, in one sitting.
3Pilot the battery yourself: the four tasks take about 26 minutes.
4Review quality flags before comparing groups.

How each test is scored

The server scores each test when the participant finishes it. The primary score is the one the app compares with a norm. The other scores are reported with it.

Every result records its scoring version. For this battery they are Continuous Performance Test 1.0.0, Stop-Signal Task 1.2.0, Go/No-Go Task 1.0.0 and Eriksen Flanker Task 1.0.0.

How each test is scored
TestScoreWhat it isBetter
Continuous Performance TestHit Rate (proportion)Proportion of target trials with a response.Higher is better
Continuous Performance TestFalse Alarm Rate (proportion)Proportion of non-target trials with an incorrect response.Lower is better
Continuous Performance Testd-Prime (primary)Signal-detection sensitivity combining target hits and non-target false alarms.Higher is better
Continuous Performance TestOmission ErrorsTarget trials where no response was recorded.Lower is better
Continuous Performance TestCommission ErrorsNon-target trials where a response was recorded.Lower is better
Continuous Performance TestMean Hit RT (ms)Lower is better when accuracy is maintained
Continuous Performance TestRT VariabilityHit RT standard deviation divided by mean hit RT.Lower is better
Continuous Performance TestTime-on-Task Slope (ms/trial)Linear change in hit RT across the scored block.Informational
Stop-Signal TaskStop-Signal Reaction Time (ms, primary)Integration-method estimate of the covert stopping latency: the nth fastest go RT minus the mean stop-signal delay, with n the number of go trials times p(respond|signal). Every go trial counts, choice errors included, and a go trial with no response counts at the slowest go RT (Verbruggen et al. 2019).Lower is better when validity flags pass
Stop-Signal TaskSSRT, Correct Go Trials Only (ms)The estimate used before scoring version 1.1.0: correct go RTs only, with go omissions and choice errors left out. It runs shorter when go trials were missed. For comparing with earlier results.Informational
Stop-Signal TaskStop Success Rate (proportion)Proportion of stop trials where the participant successfully withheld a response.Near 0.50 is expected under a working staircase
Stop-Signal TaskGo Reaction Time (ms)Mean reaction time on correct go trials.Informational
Stop-Signal TaskGo Accuracy (proportion)Proportion of go trials answered with the correct arrow key.Higher is better
Stop-Signal TaskFailed-Stop RT (ms)Mean reaction time on stop trials where the participant failed to inhibit.Should usually be faster than go RT
Stop-Signal TaskValid SSRT Flag (0/1)Indicates whether core SSRT validity checks passed.1 indicates interpretable SSRT
Go/No-Go TaskMean Go RT (ms)Average reaction time on correct Go trials. Reflects processing speed for respond conditions.Lower is better
Go/No-Go TaskGo Accuracy (proportion)Proportion of Go trials with a correct response. Low values suggest inattention.Higher is better
Go/No-Go TaskNo-Go Accuracy (proportion)Proportion of No-Go trials correctly withheld. Directly measures inhibitory success.Higher is better
Go/No-Go Taskd-Prime (primary)Signal detection sensitivity: Z(hit rate) - Z(false alarm rate). Separates discriminability from response bias.Higher is better
Go/No-Go TaskCommission ErrorsResponses on No-Go trials (false alarms). Primary index of inhibitory failure.Lower is better
Go/No-Go TaskOmission ErrorsMissed responses on Go trials. Indicates lapses in sustained attention.Lower is better
Eriksen Flanker TaskCongruent RT (ms)Average RT on congruent trials (all arrows same direction).Lower is better
Eriksen Flanker TaskIncongruent RT (ms)Average RT on incongruent trials (flankers oppose target).Lower is better
Eriksen Flanker TaskFlanker Effect (ms, primary)Incongruent RT minus congruent RT. Primary measure of interference cost. Higher values indicate greater susceptibility to distraction.Lower is better
Eriksen Flanker TaskCongruent Accuracy (proportion)Proportion correct on congruent trials. Expected near ceiling.Higher is better
Eriksen Flanker TaskIncongruent Accuracy (proportion)Proportion correct on incongruent trials. More sensitive to attentional deficits than congruent accuracy.Higher is better
Eriksen Flanker TaskOverall Accuracy (proportion)Proportion correct across all trial types.Higher is better

Session quality rules

The app checks every session when it scores it and records one of four states.

An Invalid session stays in the study's results, labelled with its reason, and does not count toward norms.

A session can carry warnings and still be valid. The results list the warnings next to the scores.

Session quality rules
StateWhat it means
Norm-readyThe session passed every check and a norm exists for it, so the app can show a percentile.
Raw-onlyThe scores are usable, but the app shows no percentile. Typical reasons are no norm for the test, changed settings, or a warning that makes a comparison unfair, such as a restart or a screen too short for the display.
Invalid technicalThe setup broke the timing or the task. Examples are leaving full screen, a browser tab that lost focus during a timed test, and long pauses.
Invalid behavioralThe responses suggest the task was not done as asked. Examples are a failed attention check, repeated switching away from the task, and accuracy at or below chance on a choice task.

Published norms used

No published norm is used for any test in this battery.

ConductCognition also builds norms from its own participants. An age band of a test uses them once it holds at least 50 valid sessions on the same device and input type, run with standard settings and scored with the current scoring version. Sessions from paying customers' studies and from clinical or patient samples do not count.

A report shows a percentile only when the app has stored one for that session. Otherwise it shows the raw scores.

Every reference group covers ages 18 and over. No reference group covers a participant under 18, so their report shows raw scores only, and their sessions do not count toward norms.

How to cite

ConductScience, Inc. Attention and Impulsivity Battery guide, version 1.2.0. ConductCognition. https://conductcognition.com/batteries/attention-impulsivity/guide

Cite the guide version you used. Name the battery version (1.0.0) and the scoring versions listed in this guide.

ConductCognition

Hosted browser-native cognitive testing for academic and commercial research workflows.

A product of ConductScience, Inc.

New tests and features, about once a month. Unsubscribe at any time.

Tests

  • All cognitive tests
  • Test batteries
  • Use and evidence
  • Test norms
  • Trail Making Test
  • N-Back Task
  • Automated scoring
  • Study design
  • New tests by email

Guides

  • Methods and questions
  • Blog
  • Recruitment setup
  • Participant devices
  • Prolific
  • Sona Systems
  • CloudResearch Connect
  • Qualtrics

Use cases

  • Student participant pools
  • Aging and dementia research
  • Clinical trials
  • US clinical research
  • Remote testing

Compare and buy

  • Pricing
  • Compare platforms
  • Offline edition
  • FAQ

Trust

  • Study Quality Monitor
  • HIPAA-ready testing
  • Data export
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Data Policy

Company

  • ConductScience
  • Affiliate Program
© 2026 ConductScience, Inc. Research use only.