ConductCognition
PlatformTestsEvidencePricingGuidesOffline
Log InStart Free
  1. Home
  2. /Tests
  3. /Word Span Task

Working Memory

Word Span Task

Also called: word span test, verbal span, simple span task, serial recall of words, memory span for words

Measure verbal short-term memory span: lists of 2 to 7 everyday words recalled in order, with words written in each of eight languages.

6-8 minUntimed

Create a study with this testPreview it free

Free to start: 10 free participants per account, then $0.99 per participant for academic research, or any yearly plan. Preview any test free after you sign up.

Papers, 2021 to 2025
38
Evidence grade
C
Registered clinical studies
12
How these are counted
harpOne word at a time
potRemember the order
beargrapechinsnowcloth1harpcoinwingrobotink2potsaw
See lists of words, then tap them back in order
  • Overview
  • Evidence
  • Task design
  • Quality checks
  • Settings
  • Cite
  • Questions

What it measures

Measures verbal short-term memory span. Lists of 2 to 7 common words appear one word at a time, and after each list participants click or tap the words in the order they saw them.

Constructs

  • Verbal short-term memory
  • Serial order memory
  • Memory span
  • Working memory capacity

Research uses

  • Individual-difference studies of short-term and working memory
  • Memory research across development and aging
  • Studies comparing simple and complex span tasks

How the paradigm works

The word span task measures verbal short-term memory: how many words a person can hold in order for a few seconds. Words appear one at a time at the center of the screen, one per second (each word for 800 ms, then a 200 ms blank). After each list, the participant clicks or taps the words in the order shown on a grid of twelve words, using a Blank button for any word they forgot, Clear to start over and Done to finish. Recall is untimed.

More about the paradigm

The task follows the word span of Kane and colleagues (2004), as Unsworth and Engle (2006) describe it: short nouns shown one per second, three lists of each length from 2 to 7 words in a random order, 18 lists and 81 words in all, and recall in order right after each list, with a word counted only in the place it was shown. Here recall is a click on the words, as the automated complex span tasks recall letters (Unsworth et al. 2005), so it needs no typing or spelling in any language. Every list is drawn from the same twelve words, as letter span draws from a fixed set of letters. Settings give one or two lists of each length, or a longest list of 5 to 8 words. Two practice lists, of 2 and 3 words, show the words shown, the answer and how many were in place.

The twelve words are everyday nouns written for this test, the same twelve things in each of the eight languages: things of twelve different kinds, short in every language, with no two starting alike or rhyming in a language and none used by another word test of the library. Every list is drawn from the session's seed, with no word twice in a list.

The main score is the share of words recalled in the place they were shown, the proportion correct score Unsworth and Engle (2006, 2007) report for span tasks; they prefer it to counting only lists recalled perfectly for its better psychometric properties. The partial span score (the same as a count), the absolute span score (the summed lengths of lists recalled perfectly), the partial-credit unit score (Conway et al. 2005), the span (the longest length at which at least two of the three lists were recalled perfectly), lists recalled perfectly, words recalled in any place and recall at each list length are also given. Scores support research and do not diagnose.

Scores

Words in Place%
Share of all words recalled in the place they were shown, over every test list.
Higher is better
Partial Span Scorecount
Words recalled in the place they were shown, across all lists (0 to 81 at the standard settings).
Higher is better
Absolute Span Scorecount
Sum of the lengths of the lists recalled perfectly.
Higher is better
Partial-Credit Unit Score%
Mean share of words recalled in place per list.
Higher is better
Spancount
The longest list length at which at least half of the lists (two of three at the standard settings) were recalled perfectly.
Higher is better
Lists Recalled Perfectlycount
Lists with every word recalled in its place.
Higher is better
Words in Any Place%
Share of the words shown that were entered anywhere in the answer, in or out of order.
Higher is better
Recall, Lists of 2%
Share of words recalled in place in lists of 2 words.
Under 0.5 flags the session
Recall, Lists of 3%
Share of words recalled in place in lists of 3 words.
Higher is better
Recall, Lists of 4%
Share of words recalled in place in lists of 4 words.
Higher is better
Recall, Lists of 5%
Share of words recalled in place in lists of 5 words.
Higher is better
Recall, Lists of 6%
Share of words recalled in place in lists of 6 words.
Higher is better
Recall, Lists of 7%
Share of words recalled in place in lists of 7 words.
Higher is better
Recall, Lists of 8%
Share of words recalled in place in lists of 8 words, when the setting runs them.
Higher is better
Median Recall Timems
Median time from the recall screen to Done.
Informational
Lists Completedtrials
Test lists recorded in the scored run.
Under 90% of the planned lists is invalid

Use and evidence

38 papers from 2021 to 2025 name this task in their title or abstract, down 34% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 275 of 395 test families in our census. See the counts for every test.

2021 to 2025, the years gradedEarlier years
Papers per year naming the Word Span Task, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 6; 2022: 8; 2023: 9; 2024: 10; 2025: 5 papers. Peak year 2018.051015202000: 6 papers2001: 10 papers2002: 8 papers2003: 9 papers2004: 11 papers2005: 6 papers2006: 4 papers2007: 11 papers2008: 12 papers2009: 6 papers2010: 14 papers2011: 11 papers2012: 16 papers2013: 4 papers2014: 9 papers2015: 13 papers2016: 9 papers2017: 13 papers2018: 19 papers2019: 11 papers2020: 6 papers2021: 6 papers2022: 8 papers2023: 9 papers2024: 10 papers2025: 5 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year naming the Word Span Task, 2000 to 2025Bar chart. 2021: 6; 2022: 8; 2023: 9; 2024: 10; 2025: 5 papers. Peak year 2018.051015202000: 6 papers2001: 10 papers2002: 8 papers2003: 9 papers2004: 11 papers2005: 6 papers2006: 4 papers2007: 11 papers2008: 12 papers2009: 6 papers2010: 14 papers2011: 11 papers2012: 16 papers2013: 4 papers2014: 9 papers2015: 13 papers2016: 9 papers2017: 13 papers2018: 19 papers2019: 11 papers2020: 6 papers2021: 6 papers2022: 8 papers2023: 9 papers2024: 10 papers2025: 5 papers200020052010201520202025
Papers per year whose title or abstract names this task (OpenAlex).
Show the numbers
YearPapers
20255
202410
20239
20228
20216
20206
201911
201819
201713
20169
201513
20149
20134
201216
201111
201014
20096
200812
200711
20064
20056
200411
20039
20028
200110
20006
D

Use grade D

30 to 99 papers from 2021 to 2025.

C

Evidence grade C

At least 2 test-retest papers, 30 reliability or validity papers or 3 registered clinical studies.

Papers on test-retest reliability
2
Papers on reliability or validity
21
Registered clinical studies using it as an outcome
12
How the grades work

Use: A is 1,000 or more papers from 2021 to 2025, B 300 to 999, C 100 to 299, D 30 to 99 and E fewer than 30. Evidence: A means at least 25 papers report its test-retest reliability and at least 25 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome; B, at least 8 test-retest papers, and either 5 registered clinical studies or 150 reliability or validity papers; C, at least 2 test-retest papers, 30 reliability or validity papers or 3 registered clinical studies; D, little published measurement evidence found. The counts measure use. They include every paper that names the task in its title or abstract. Grades describe the published research on this task, not ConductCognition's version of it.

Source: ConductCognition test census 0.14.0, counted 31 October 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Task design

The trial sequence as the test runs in ConductCognition.

Words
Twelve everyday nouns written for this test, the same twelve things in each of eight languages, shown as buttons on the recall screen. Every list is drawn from them, with no word twice in a list.
Lists
Three lists of each length from 2 to 7 words in a random order, 18 lists and 81 words (standard; one to three lists of each length, and a longest list of 5 to 8 words).
Trial
A fixation cross for 1,000 ms, then each word for 800 ms with a 200 ms blank, then recall.
Recall
Click or tap the words in the order shown on a grid of the twelve words; Blank holds the place of a forgotten word, Clear starts over and Done ends the list. Untimed.
Practice
Two lists, of 2 and 3 words, each followed by the words shown, the answer and how many were in place.
Score
The share of words recalled in their place. Partial and absolute span scores, the partial-credit unit score, the span, and recall at each list length.

Kane and colleagues' participants wrote their answers and never saw a word twice; here every list is drawn from twelve words shown at recall, as letter span tasks draw from a fixed set of letters.

Quality checks

Each session is marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason, before you see its scores.

Scored rows: test-phase recall entries of the scored run, one per list. A whole list in order has no meaningful chance level, so accuracy is not judged against chance; recall is untimed, so nothing can be missed. Fewer than 90% of the planned lists invalidates, and so does a session with no word entered on any list. Words of the two-word lists entered in place under 50% of the time flag the session and withhold the percentile. A hidden tab withholds the percentile.

Why these rules

Two words in a row are within almost anyone's span, so missing most of them means the lists were not followed rather than a short span. The limits are ConductScience choices. A hidden tab lets the study, delay or response timers run without the participant, so a percentile is withheld after one.

Running this test

Settings you can change

SettingStandardAllowed
Lists of each length31 to 3
Longest list (words)75 to 8

Yearly plans can change settings within these limits. Free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

How test settings work

Need a setting this test does not have?

Devices and languages

  • Untimed test: runs on desktops, laptops, tablets and phones. Participant devices
  • Languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese.
  • Available on: Every plan, including the free plan.
  • Recruiting online? See the setup guides for Prolific, Sona Systems, CloudResearch Connect and Qualtrics.

Cite and describe

Methods text, with the standard settings

Participants completed the Word Span Task in a web browser (ConductCognition task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0; Kane et al., 2004; Unsworth and Engle, 2006), with the standard settings (lists of each length: 3; longest list (words): 7). The main score was words in place (share of all words recalled in the place they were shown, over every test list).

ConductCognition versions: task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0. Every export records the versions each session used, for a methods section.

  • Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2006). Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(1), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.06.003The procedure: short nouns at one per second, three lists of each length from 2 to 7 in a random order, scored by words in their place.
  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189-217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189The study whose word span this procedure comes from.
  • Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133(6), 1038-1066. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.1038Absolute and proportion correct scoring, and why the proportion is preferred.
  • Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769-786. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772Partial-credit and absolute scoring of span tasks.
  • Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192720Recall by clicking the items in order, with Blank and Clear.

Source papers

  • Unsworth N, Engle RW (2006). Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(1):68-80.Paradigm source, 18-35
  • Kane MJ, Hambrick DZ, Tuholski SW, Wilhelm O, Payne TW, Engle RW (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2):189-217.Paradigm source, 18-35

Questions

How long does the Word Span Task take?

About 6 to 8 minutes, as listed in the test library.

What device does a participant need?

Untimed test: runs on desktops, laptops, tablets and phones. The browser must be Chrome, Edge, Firefox or Safari.

What scores does it produce?

Words in Place, Partial Span Score, Absolute Span Score, Partial-Credit Unit Score, Span, Lists Recalled Perfectly, Words in Any Place, Recall, Lists of 2, Recall, Lists of 3, Recall, Lists of 4, Recall, Lists of 5, Recall, Lists of 6, Recall, Lists of 7, Recall, Lists of 8, Median Recall Time and Lists Completed. Each session is also marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason.

How widely is the Word Span Task used in research?

38 papers from 2021 to 2025 name it in their title or abstract, down 34% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 275 of 395 test families in the ConductCognition test census (use grade D). Source: ConductCognition test census 0.14.0, counted 31 October 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.

How much reliability evidence does the Word Span Task have?

In the published research, 2 papers report its test-retest reliability and 12 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome (evidence grade C in the ConductCognition test census).

Which settings can a researcher change?

Lists of each length (1 to 3) and longest list (words) (5 to 8). Settings can be changed on yearly plans; free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.

Which languages can participants use?

Participants can take this test in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese, with its words in the same language. English is on every plan, and the other languages come with yearly plans. Have a native speaker read the machine-translated text before launch.

Is this a clinical test?

No. ConductCognition is for research use only. It runs, scores and exports the test; clinical interpretation is outside the platform.

Every test: the full test list.

Run this test in your next study

Start free with 10 free participants on any test, then use participant credits or a yearly plan.

Start freePreview it free

Related tests

Digit Span TestReading Span TaskVerbal Learning
ConductCognition

Hosted browser-native cognitive testing for academic and commercial research workflows.

A product of ConductScience, Inc.

Tests

  • All cognitive tests
  • Use and evidence
  • Test norms
  • Trail Making Test
  • N-Back Task
  • Automated scoring
  • Study design

Guides

  • Recruitment setup
  • Participant devices
  • Prolific
  • Sona Systems
  • CloudResearch Connect
  • Qualtrics

Use cases

  • Student participant pools
  • Aging and dementia research
  • Clinical trials
  • US clinical research
  • Remote testing

Compare and buy

  • Pricing
  • Compare platforms
  • Offline edition
  • FAQ

Trust

  • Study Quality Monitor
  • HIPAA-ready testing
  • Data export
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Data Policy

Company

  • ConductScience
  • Affiliate Program
© 2026 ConductScience, Inc. Research use only.