Working Memory
Grid Pattern Span Task
Also called: visual pattern span, matrix pattern span, static matrix task, visual matrix span
Measure visual short-term memory for patterns: a grid with about half its squares dark is shown for 3 seconds, then the dark squares are marked on an empty grid, and the grids grow until none of a size is reproduced.
6-10 minUntimed
Free to start: 10 free participants per account, then $0.99 per participant for academic research, or any yearly plan. Preview any test free after you sign up.
- Papers, 2021 to 2025
- 12
- Evidence grade
- C
- Registered clinical studies
- 5
What it measures
Measures visual short-term memory for patterns. A grid with about half its squares dark is shown for 3 seconds, then the participant marks the dark squares on an empty grid. Grids grow from 2 dark squares until none of a size is reproduced.
Constructs
- Visual short-term memory
- Visuospatial working memory
- Pattern memory
Research uses
- Research on visual and spatial memory after brain injury and stroke
- Development of visuospatial working memory in children
- Aging and visual memory research beside the Corsi span
How the paradigm works
The Grid Pattern Span Task measures visual short-term memory for patterns: how many squares of a pattern seen all at once a person can keep in mind. A grid of squares appears with about half of them dark for 3 seconds, the grid empties, and the participant marks the squares that were dark, in any order, then chooses Done. The grids grow from 2 dark squares in a 2 by 2 grid to 15 in a 5 by 6 grid, 3 grids at each size, and the task stops after a size at which no grid was reproduced. This is the pattern span procedure of Wilson, Scott and Power (1987) and Della Sala and colleagues (1999), with patterns made by filling squares at random, as Phillips (1974) made them; the grids and patterns are this task's own, drawn anew for each session.
More about the paradigm
Pattern span holds a static pattern, seen at once and recalled in any order. The Corsi Block-Tapping Test holds a path instead: blocks light one at a time and are tapped back in order. The two spans come apart in patients with brain lesions and under different kinds of interference (Della Sala and colleagues 1999), and memory for patterns develops apart from memory for movement sequences in children (Logie and Pearson 1997), so running both separates visual from spatial-sequential memory.
Each grid shows empty for 1 second, then with its pattern for 3 seconds (1 to 5 in the settings), then empty again for the answer, with no time limit; Done is ready once as many squares are marked as were dark, and a square chosen again is unmarked. Every grid has the smallest shape of at least twice its dark squares that keeps the squares at least 44 pixels wide on a phone, so exactly half the squares are dark except at 7, 11, 13 and 14 squares, where a few more are light. Two practice grids, of 2 and 3 squares, end with the pattern shown again and whether it was marked right. A setting gives 2 grids at each size in place of 3. Naming parts of a pattern can help (Brown, Forbes and McConnell 2006), so the patterns are random rather than chosen to be hard to name.
The main score is the span: the most dark squares in a grid reproduced exactly. The task also reports the grids reproduced over all sizes, the share of dark squares marked (partial credit for grids not reproduced), the largest size shown and the time to answer. Scores support research and do not diagnose.
Scores
- Pattern Spancount
- The most dark squares in a grid reproduced exactly.
- Higher means larger patterns were held in mind
- Grids Reproducedcount
- Grids whose marked squares were exactly the dark squares, over all sizes.
- Higher is better
- Squares Marked%
- Share of all dark squares shown that were marked, including grids not reproduced.
- Higher is better
- Largest Size Showncount
- Dark squares in the last size the task reached.
- Informational
- Grids Showncount
- Grids shown in the scored run.
- Informational
- Answer Timems
- Median time from the empty grid to Done.
- Informational
Use and evidence
12 papers from 2021 to 2025 name this task in their title or abstract, down 20% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 365 of 395 test families in our census. See the counts for every test.
Show the numbers
| Year | Papers |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 1 |
| 2024 | 6 |
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2022 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1 |
| 2020 | 1 |
| 2019 | 2 |
| 2018 | 2 |
| 2017 | 5 |
| 2016 | 5 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5 |
| 2013 | 2 |
| 2012 | 3 |
| 2011 | 7 |
| 2010 | 4 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2008 | 2 |
| 2007 | 3 |
| 2006 | 4 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2004 | 2 |
| 2003 | 0 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2001 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0 |
Use grade E
Fewer than 30 papers from 2021 to 2025.
Evidence grade C
At least 2 test-retest papers, 30 reliability or validity papers or 3 registered clinical studies.
- Papers on test-retest reliability
- 0
- Papers on reliability or validity
- 2
- Registered clinical studies using it as an outcome
- 5
How the grades work
Use: A is 1,000 or more papers from 2021 to 2025, B 300 to 999, C 100 to 299, D 30 to 99 and E fewer than 30. Evidence: A means at least 25 papers report its test-retest reliability and at least 25 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome; B, at least 8 test-retest papers, and either 5 registered clinical studies or 150 reliability or validity papers; C, at least 2 test-retest papers, 30 reliability or validity papers or 3 registered clinical studies; D, little published measurement evidence found. The counts measure use. They include every paper that names the task in its title or abstract. Grades describe the published research on this task, not ConductCognition's version of it.
Source: ConductCognition test census 0.14.0, counted 2 November 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.
Task design
The trial sequence as the test runs in ConductCognition.
- Grids
- Drawn by code for each session: 2 to 15 dark squares, on grids from 2 by 2 to 5 by 6 with about half the squares dark, and a new random pattern for every grid.
- Each grid
- Shown empty for 1,000 ms, then with its pattern for 3,000 ms (standard; 1,000 to 5,000), then empty again for the answer.
- Answer
- The dark squares marked in any order, with no time limit, then Done, which is ready once as many squares are marked as were dark. 300 ms of blank screen follow.
- Sizes
- 3 grids at each size (standard; 2 to 3), from 2 dark squares upward. The task stops after a size at which no grid was reproduced, or after 15 squares.
- Practice
- Grids of 2 and 3 squares, each followed by 2,000 ms of feedback that shows the pattern.
- Main score
- The span: the most dark squares in a grid reproduced exactly. Grids reproduced and the share of dark squares marked are also reported.
The Corsi Block-Tapping Test holds a path tapped back in order; this task holds a pattern seen all at once, and the two can come apart (Della Sala et al. 1999). The grids are this task's own, so published norms for other pattern span tests do not apply. The scores support research and do not diagnose.
Quality checks
Each session is marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason, before you see its scores.
Scored rows: test-phase recall entries of the scored run, one per grid. A whole grid has no meaningful chance level, so accuracy is not judged against chance; recall is untimed, so nothing can be missed. A run that stops before a size with no grid reproduced (or before the largest size) invalidates, and so does a session with no filled square marked on any grid. No grid of the smallest size reproduced flags the session and withholds the percentile. A hidden tab withholds the percentile.
Why these rules
Two dark squares in a 2 by 2 grid are within almost anyone's span, so missing all of them means the grids were not followed rather than a short span. The limits are ConductScience choices. A hidden tab lets the study, delay or response timers run without the participant, so a percentile is withheld after one.
Running this test
Settings you can change
| Setting | Standard | Allowed |
|---|---|---|
| Grids at each size | 3 | 2 to 3 |
| Pattern display (ms) | 3,000 | 1,000 to 5,000 |
Yearly plans can change settings within these limits. Free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.
Need a setting this test does not have?
Devices and languages
- Untimed test: runs on desktops, laptops, tablets and phones. Participant devices
- Languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese.
- Available on: Every plan, including the free plan.
- Recruiting online? See the setup guides for Prolific, Sona Systems, CloudResearch Connect and Qualtrics.
Cite and describe
Participants completed the Grid Pattern Span Task in a web browser (ConductCognition task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0; Wilson, Scott & Power, 1987; Della Sala et al., 1999), with the standard settings (grids at each size: 3; pattern display (ms): 3,000). The main score was pattern span (the most dark squares in a grid reproduced exactly).
ConductCognition versions: task version 1.0.0, scoring version 1.0.0. Every export records the versions each session used, for a methods section.
- Wilson, J. T. L., Scott, J. H., & Power, K. G. (1987). Developmental differences in the span of visual memory for pattern. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(3), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1987.tb01060.xA span for patterns, from children to adults.
- Della Sala, S., Gray, C., Baddeley, A., Allamano, N., & Wilson, L. (1999). Pattern span: A tool for unwelding visuo-spatial memory. Neuropsychologia, 37(10), 1189-1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00159-6Pattern span set beside the Corsi span: visual and spatial-sequential memory come apart.
- Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(2), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203943Patterns made by filling the cells of a grid at random.
- Logie, R. H., & Pearson, D. G. (1997). The inner eye and the inner scribe of visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence from developmental fractionation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752559Memory for patterns develops apart from memory for sequences of movements.
- Brown, L. A., Forbes, D., & McConnell, J. (2006). Limiting the use of verbal coding in the Visual Patterns Test. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(7), 1169-1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600665954Patterns shown for 3 seconds and recalled on an empty grid; naming parts of a pattern can raise the span.
Source papers
- Wilson JTL, Scott JH, Power KG (1987). Developmental differences in the span of visual memory for pattern. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(3):249-255.Paradigm source, Children 5 to 11 and adults
- Della Sala S, Gray C, Baddeley A, Allamano N, Wilson L (1999). Pattern span: a tool for unwelding visuo-spatial memory. Neuropsychologia, 37(10):1189-1199.Paradigm source, Adults and patients
- ConductCognition platform normsParadigm source, N/A
Questions
How long does the Grid Pattern Span Task take?
About 6 to 10 minutes, as listed in the test library.
What device does a participant need?
Untimed test: runs on desktops, laptops, tablets and phones. The browser must be Chrome, Edge, Firefox or Safari.
What scores does it produce?
Pattern Span, Grids Reproduced, Squares Marked, Largest Size Shown, Grids Shown and Answer Time. Each session is also marked valid, needs review or invalid, with the reason.
How widely is the Grid Pattern Span Task used in research?
12 papers from 2021 to 2025 name it in their title or abstract, down 20% compared with 2016 to 2020. That ranks it 365 of 395 test families in the ConductCognition test census (use grade E). Source: ConductCognition test census 0.14.0, counted 2 November 2026 from OpenAlex and ClinicalTrials.gov.
How much reliability evidence does the Grid Pattern Span Task have?
In the published research, 0 papers report its test-retest reliability and 5 registered clinical studies use it as an outcome (evidence grade C in the ConductCognition test census).
Which settings can a researcher change?
Grids at each size (2 to 3) and pattern display (ms) (1,000 to 5,000). Settings can be changed on yearly plans; free and pay-as-you-go studies use the standard settings.
Which languages can participants use?
Participants can take this test in English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified) and Japanese. English is on every plan, and the other languages come with yearly plans. Have a native speaker read the machine-translated text before launch.
Is this a clinical test?
No. ConductCognition is for research use only. It runs, scores and exports the test; clinical interpretation is outside the platform.
Every test: the full test list.
Run this test in your next study
Start free with 10 free participants on any test, then use participant credits or a yearly plan.